It is strange.For very long time the two different shools of thought (evolutionists and creationists) are fighting each other,in the wrong field, where no logical verdict can be drown.The only result is just tension between them.
Fortunatly during last years it became more than evident, that environment forwards to genome information that plays substantial role in life evolution. We see this role to increase each day thanks to cellular biology research.
This fact does not negate evolution theory, or its basic ideas ( e.g random mutations, n. selection), but surely decreases its size of participation in creating life divergence. Nature is quite clever not to use any possible useful mechanism for life preservation and advance of evolution. And information flow together with random mutations and n. selection are so useful things no to be used.
The real and critical question lies here: is this information, arriving from natural laws, able to give the answers needed to explain life appearance and then life evolution? Or something more is needed?
Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.
'If that much-spoken 'evidence" of followers of random mutations is this 'some evidence' of Panda, then there is a serious matter of credibility in this forum.