Given this assertion:
There is also not a shred of evidence that ANYONE but atheists, with the complete approval of their "religious" allies (theistic evolutionists, Deists, etc.) make all decisions concerning publicly funded/government sponsored methods of exploration in science.
it becomes clear that by "atheist" you really mean "scientist". Accordingly, I have made that change in the thread subtitle.
That quoted statement of yours is factually wrong. Politicians make the primary decision on public funding of science. And republicans get to participate in that political process.
It is true that the politicians may make only the primary decisions, and delegate secondary decisions to scientists. However, that only happens because the politicians have decided that the scientist can generally be trusted as the most capable of making these decisions. I see it as a plus that scientists are involved in this way.
You seem to think that science is some sort of grand conspiracy to produce false descriptions of the world. But that is an utterly absurd idea.
- Your automobile would not work if it were based on a false description;
- Air travel would not work if it were based on a false description;
- The Internet would not work if it were based on a false description;
- Modern medicine would not work if it were based on a false description;
- etc, etc, etc.
Science provides the best, most accurate, descriptions of the world that we have. If you were a true creationist, then you would believe that science accurately describes the world that your God created. Your denial of science is nothing less than a denial of creationism. You apparently believe in a false creationism that denies that the world that we can see was created by your God.
Jesus was a liberal hippie