Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism Road Trip
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3845 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 33 of 409 (678588)
11-09-2012 8:39 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Theodoric
11-09-2012 1:25 AM


Re: One Day
Theodoric:
So who is advocating collectivization?
You really need to stay away from Glenn Beck.
The Unions are collectivism, albeit Syndicalism, aren't they?
The Progressives advance the Unions.
This is Marxism which is actually a economic system for the distribution of goods and services which levies a special "Tax" on all consumers by raising the prices.
The price increases for the goods or services produced is used to pay "profits" to both the traditional corporate leadership and then the Union leaders, and of course, benefits to the individual membership.
Each member of a unionized corporation gains benefits at the expense of charging the general public more for its end product of services or goods.
Those people who initiate the Progressive drive to Unionize based upon criticism of gouging in the form of making a Profit fail to see that they double those "profits" by raising the prices and re-distributing "profit" among the fat labor Leaders and hard working membership.
This is De facto, a Tax on the larger society, re-distributed to workers in key economic positions, and add-on in the price of the goods.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Theodoric, posted 11-09-2012 1:25 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Theodoric, posted 11-09-2012 9:37 AM kofh2u has replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3845 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 49 of 409 (678655)
11-09-2012 5:32 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Theodoric
11-09-2012 9:37 AM


Re: One Day
Theodoric
This is De facto, a Tax on the larger society, re-distributed to workers in key economic positions, and add-on in the price of the goods
Not a tax in any sense of the word. If this were true. ANything the owner makes is a "a Tax on the larger society,..and add-on in the price of the goods."
You are really a funny guy if you believe a raise in your Public Utility costs isn't tax money which has merely circumvented the normal collection process simply because you re-define the connotation of the word Tax or those other words you need review.
When the Teachers Union demands full pay retirement benefits after 30 years employment, the Real Estate Taxes MUST go up to get that money set aside into their retirement fund.
It you own a home, review the tax paid to your county every year and you will see than @80% of that tax is School Tax.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Theodoric, posted 11-09-2012 9:37 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by nwr, posted 11-09-2012 5:44 PM kofh2u has not replied
 Message 56 by Theodoric, posted 11-09-2012 9:57 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3845 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 50 of 409 (678656)
11-09-2012 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Stile
11-09-2012 10:57 AM


Re: On discrimination
Mr Stiles:
also totally agree.
I don't mean to imply that the coming generation I'm talking about is "perfect" or somehow going to be impervious to scams or mistakes or dishonest tactics.
I'm just saying that I think they're going to be better than us at it as a general population (and that doesn't really take too much).
I think it's going to be significantly better than us, too. But even that is still a long way from "as good as it can be"... or even "good" (hopefully we'll get there, though... in a few hundred years).
The tools they have available, and the possibility/potential for being better than us is incredibly higher than it was even just 20-30 years ago. The rest is nothing more than my own faithfully optimistic theory on how it can pan out.
Again you are unthinking and misled by failure to delve deeper into the facts and accept the platitudes that a liberal minded feminist society indoctrinates you with.
The facts are that America has TWO kinds of kids, asdetailed and definitively described by Chas Murray in his recent book, "Coming Apart."
With Welfare families now raising almost half of the kids in America, these fatherless children are responsible for 70% of all social problems, including High School drop out, failing schools, and violent crime.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Stile, posted 11-09-2012 10:57 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024