Shall I then equally assume that you meant I was "right" in the entirety of my previous message, since you did not refute, partly, any of it?
Has it been a year already? Wow!
Shall I then equally assume that you meant I was "right" in the entirety of my previous message, since you did not refute, partly, any of it?
Perhaps you're having trouble comprehending my simple words in that super advanced brain of yours. I wasn't debating you, I agreed with you "We don't want to listen to an intellectually lazy person."
What part of that seemed as though I was debating you? I'll give you another year to answer if you like.
I am going to conclude that because of my beliefs, you are going to dismiss any information I provide, carte blanche.
Or did you have nothing more to say, other than, "you are lazy intellectually?" If that is the sum of your reasoning then it is only fair that a qualified and intellectual refutation is; "No I am not."
You're bringing a lot of baggage to this post.
I agreed with you, nothing more.
But if we must go there, no, I wouldn't dismiss anything you said carte blanche because I don't know what we are even debating. I do agree though, anyone who is a literal Bible creationist is being intellectually lazy. The answer "God did it" doesn't explain anything. It doesn't explain "how" it was done.
If someone is satisfied with "God did it" and no further questions, then they are being intellectually lazy.
n your speed to respond, you didn't, it seems, stop to think that your own post was an example of intellectual laziness, despite your unnecessary and unproven allusion to me being intellectually lazy.
I don't know why I would need to elaborate on anything when I was simply agreeing with your statement. And frankly, I wasn't expecting you back for a year, so I made it short and sweet.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.