|
Author
|
Topic: Corporate Tax Evasion
|
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 921 Joined: 12-26-2011
|
|
Message 31 of 100 (681728)
11-27-2012 3:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 26 by Modulous
11-27-2012 2:46 PM
|
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
I was talking about normal people like the tea party people; not the welfare leeches and people who want the government to steal money from productive types. That is who that 9 million immigrants consist of. It also includes the islamic folks who are there merely to outbreed the indigenous population and make them enslaved to sharia law at some point in the future.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 26 by Modulous, posted 11-27-2012 2:46 PM | | Modulous has seen this message but not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 32 by Taq, posted 11-27-2012 3:07 PM | | foreveryoung has replied | | | Message 43 by Straggler, posted 11-27-2012 5:40 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied | | | Message 51 by NoNukes, posted 11-27-2012 6:30 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
Taq
Member Posts: 10038 Joined: 03-06-2009 Member Rating: 5.3
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
I was talking about normal people like the tea party people; Normal people do not think that Obama was born in Kenya and is a secret muslim. Normal people do not accuse others of bigotry while in the same sentence stating how they despise those who disagree with them. Edited by Taq, : No reason given.
|
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 921 Joined: 12-26-2011
|
|
|
Message 33 of 100 (681731)
11-27-2012 3:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 26 by Modulous
11-27-2012 2:46 PM
|
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
I would respond, but I cannot for fear of being permanently banned.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 26 by Modulous, posted 11-27-2012 2:46 PM | | Modulous has seen this message but not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 34 by Larni, posted 11-27-2012 3:12 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
I would respond, but I cannot for fear of being permanently banned. You should risk it.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 33 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 3:07 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
DrJones*
Member Posts: 2285 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: 08-19-2004 Member Rating: 7.4
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
the tea party people would all band together to help each other financially so that they could make it to britain and start from scratch.
Wait so the TPer's are commies now?
It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry
Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 11 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 11:50 AM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Freedom of choice?
Okay so when you said "Also, let the tea party types in america come join the people in britain you guys mock and spit upon." you already knew that even Tea Party members were allowed to emigrate from the US. So now you want to " Get rid of those A-wipes and their rulers and we will emigrate like gang busters.", is that correct? Why is it that we never hear any of the folk you call A-Wipes suggesting that the Tea Party members should be gotten rid of? Why is it that no one does much more than just laugh at the Tea Party and its members?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 2:28 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
nwr
Member Posts: 6409 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: 08-08-2005 Member Rating: 5.3
|
(2)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Freedom of choice?
foreveryoung writes:Yes, but who in their right minds want to emigrate to britain when it is full of Dr Adequate types and ruled by the same? Get rid of those A-wipes and their rulers and we will emigrate like gang busters.
Hey, Brits - can you kick out all of the Dr. A types. Please. Pretty please. That way, all of the tea party A-wipes from America will go there, leaving the USA a far better place.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 2:28 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 39 by Larni, posted 11-27-2012 4:46 PM | | nwr has replied |
|
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: 09-02-2008
|
|
|
Message 38 of 100 (681749)
11-27-2012 4:45 PM
|
|
|
Let's get back on topic
As one of the inhabitants of the countries that are facilitating this kind of behaviour, I'd like to first say "Neener neener neener, we're getting money that belongs to you" to the Brits. And second, that the only way to stop this is finally making the European Union not just a lame experiment, but a fully operational and legislative orginization, like the nation states of Europe are now. Make the nation states governments executive bodies for the laws passed in Unity!
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 39 of 100 (681750)
11-27-2012 4:46 PM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by nwr
11-27-2012 4:32 PM
|
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
Hey, Brits - can you kick out all of the Dr. A types. Please. Pretty please. Not the most attractive of deals...
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 37 by nwr, posted 11-27-2012 4:32 PM | | nwr has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 40 by nwr, posted 11-27-2012 4:52 PM | | Larni has replied |
|
nwr
Member Posts: 6409 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: 08-08-2005 Member Rating: 5.3
|
|
|
Message 40 of 100 (681752)
11-27-2012 4:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 39 by Larni
11-27-2012 4:46 PM
|
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
Not the most attractive of deals...
I didn't expect you to jump for it. I'm assuming that Brits are good enough at recognizing sarcasm, that they would not be offended by my "suggestion."
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 39 by Larni, posted 11-27-2012 4:46 PM | | Larni has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 41 by Larni, posted 11-27-2012 5:01 PM | | nwr has seen this message but not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 41 of 100 (681754)
11-27-2012 5:01 PM
|
Reply to: Message 40 by nwr
11-27-2012 4:52 PM
|
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
Lol. No worries, I got it. Just the typical British understated, wry acknowledgment.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 40 by nwr, posted 11-27-2012 4:52 PM | | nwr has seen this message but not replied |
|
Straggler
Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: 09-30-2006
|
Simplifying Corporation Tax
Straggler writes: "Simplify" in what way and how will "simplifying" in this manner help the situation? F writes: If you simplify the tax code, there are no loopholes that will let you "evade" taxes. OK. So, in your view, simplifying corporation tax is the key to increasing revenues accrued from corporate tax. Is that correct? In what way would you simplify corporation tax so that the loopholes currently being exploited would be eliminated? I genuinely want to know. Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 21 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 2:33 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
Straggler
Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: 09-30-2006
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Freedom of choice?
F writes: I was talking about normal people like the tea party people; This is very off-topic but if the Tea Party are "normal" people how did the democrats with Obama at their helm win the last two general elections? Because I would have thought that would require a sizeable amount of "normal people" to have voted for him..... No?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 31 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 3:05 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
Straggler
Member Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: 09-30-2006
|
|
|
Message 44 of 100 (681762)
11-27-2012 5:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 18 by cavediver
11-27-2012 1:46 PM
|
|
Cavedeiver writes: You are still paying tax, sometimes perhaps not much less than you would if you paid it all in say the UK, but you are still paying a bit less. The issue is that country X sees that tax revenue and not the UK. I might be wrong but didn't the one of these companies that is based in Ireland (Google?) pay something like 300 million in tax in Ireland? On billions of pounds of profit that doesn't seem very much and I'm sure the Irish corp tax isn't that much lower than the UK's. I can check these figures if you think they are substantially wrong. But I guess my point is that full corporation tax doesn't seem to be being paid by these companies anywhere. Even the places they nominally operate out of seem to see only a fraction of it.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 18 by cavediver, posted 11-27-2012 1:46 PM | | cavediver has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 46 by cavediver, posted 11-27-2012 6:05 PM | | Straggler has replied |
|
Tanypteryx
Member Posts: 4411 From: Oregon, USA Joined: 08-27-2006 Member Rating: 5.4
|
Re: Freedom of choice?
fey writes: Yes, but who in their right minds want to emigrate to britain when it is full of Dr Adequate types and ruled by the same? Get rid of those A-wipes and their rulers and we will emigrate like gang busters. So, what's your point, beyond "I'm righteous and good and anyone who disagrees with anything I say is evil and bad."? Do you just come here to yell and call names? Or, are you trying to convince us that you are a righteous, good person? What an odd way of going about it. Your self-righteous indignation and temper tantrums demonstrate exactly what kind of person you are, to everyone. So, what's your point?
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by foreveryoung, posted 11-27-2012 2:28 PM | | foreveryoung has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2