|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The SEVEN "DAYS" WERE GEOLOGICAL ERAS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3741 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
There were 7 disciples too!
1) Andrew 2) John 3) Philip 4) Nathaniel 5) Thomas 6) Judas Iscariot 7) Matthew kofh2u writes:
You appear to have forgotten to include several other eras. 1) The Inflation Era2) The Quark Era 3) Hadron Era 4) Lepton Era 5) Nucleosynthesis Era 6) Opaque Era 7) Matter Era,... Planck EraGrand unification Era Electroweak Era Matter domination Era Recombination Era So - that brings the number of eras to at least 12.And I am sure that there are more... "There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi kofh,
kofh2u writes: Check the Hebrew word used for "day" so we agree that this term means any appropriate duration as opposed exclusively to a 24 hour duration. I am very familiar with what the Hebrew text says. My major was Biblical Hebrew. I will accept what God says over any of man's interpertation's. God's definition of a day can be found in Genesis
quote: God called the period of light 'day'.God called the period of darkness 'night'. God called the light period ending with evening and the following morning which ended the dark period 'day one'. There is no first in the Hebrew text. Conclusion: Day one included a light period and a dark period. The second day had a morning and an evening followed by the ending of the dark period with the morning of the third day.
kofh writes: The word could mean an Age or even half a day, depending. Not according to God unless you had a very long light period followed by a very long dark period.
kofh writes: Hence if we assume that the 24 hour Earth Day did not exist when the creation story begins, it is fair to infer the duration could be eons long if our context suggsest this to be the case: You can make all the assumptions your mind desires to make. That does not make your assumption correct. God defined a day as a light period or a light period and dark period.
kofh writes: 3) We find the "seven historical durations" marked in the rocks by various events which record the History of the Earth. You find a lot of ages in the rocks as the Earth is very, very, very, very old. How old? I believe it has existed for an infinite eternity in some form.
kofh writes: But we read in Genesis about the same events, occurring in the same sequence and time frame but referred to as days. Genesis 1:2 through Genesis 2:3 does not even talk about creation. Creation takes place in Genesis 1:1 and the history of that light period which ended at Genesis 1:2 is found in Genesis 2:4 and the following verses, through Genesis 4:24.
kofh writes: Gen. 1:9 And (Father Nature, the first cause), God, said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, (Panthalassa), and let (Pangea/Rodinia), the dry land appear: (composed of the Seven Large Tectonic Plates): quote: I don't see any mention of 'Father Nature', or the Seven Large Tectonic Plates. I do see where all the dry land was in one place, call it what ever you want. The plates were there but they were not mentioned. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi kofh,
kofh writes: 2) But we also can refer to the scripture that tells us that a day is like a thousand years to god. You could read the scripture also.
quote: One day as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day. Sounds like Peter is saying God is not limited by time as He is not subject to time being and infinite eternal God. Peter is not saying one day is a thousand years.Neither is he saying one thousand years is a day. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
You could read the scripture also.
Yep.It sounds like the Bible writers made sure that we would have scriptural authority to take such a liberty as to entertain a day to God that is not an Earth day. Clearly, Genesis used a literary technique in the way it unfolds the story such that ancient people would relate to what actually is an almost unbelievable truth about Evolution. This verse would have been a very nice interjection just o we could found this kind of interpretation and rest it upon the authority of sola scripture. Assuming that Theistic Evolution has merit, this verse is very convenient in this Age, when knowledge abounds and men run to and fro. But of course it also can be found in the Psalms, too. What I like about understanding the day of the Lord, or the seven days of God as long durations is that with such a cravat, Genesis becomes literally scientifically correct. I like to read the Bible as 100% factually true.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
Sorry but your idea is just bullshit. Ok, then you are not open to this idea.Please stay out of the thread since you have already made your decision for God based upon this very first difference of opinion between us. Thank you for participating.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
Numerology is always lame. But in this case what you are insisting on is that the numbers are more important than even the words in the Bible. And in my opinion, you need to provide some reason for that to be true before anyone ought to consider what you say. You might have a point.Start a thread on that and I will discuss the off topic issue while you muddle thru Genesis 1 with me here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Sorry but you don't get to decide who can or cannot comment.
Your own source said "a day (24 hour period) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1" Genesis 1 uses exactly that phrase and I posted the content of Genesis 1 for you since it seemed you had never read it. I'll post it again for you in case you didn't read it yet.
quote: Note each period is defined by an evening and a morning, a 24 hour day. You are free to post your bullshit but I will continue to point out when you post nonsense. Unlike you, I take the Bible and Christianity seriously.Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
[qs]
[/qd]
1)Right. The verse said:Gen. 1:9 And (Father Nature, the first cause), God, said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, (Panthalassa), and let (Pangea/Rodinia), the dry land appear: (composed of the Seven Large Tectonic Plates): 2) See how important reading com0rehension is when one starts with a psychological pre-set mind?You missed the statement that there are seven LARGE plates. This is why Bible readers in different Ages have found Genesis plausible even when they midunderstood it.They basically already knew the general story because of the paradigm within which they lived. So they would never have realized that the whole 4th "day" of the creation was directed are creating an Earth Clock by assigning the Sun to the Sloar Clock, the Moon to be time keeper of the Calendar, and the stars for maintaining the accuracy of Sidereal Time. 3) The whole 4th day was entirely devoted to the establishment of Earth Time.This is so inordinately unusual in this otherwise step-by-step unfolding that we can assume it is done intentionally to explains the seven "days" are NOT earth days.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Please point out where Genesis 1 says (Father Nature, the first cause) or (Panthalassa) or (Pangea/Rodinia) or (composed of the Seven Large Tectonic Plates).
In case you have not read Genesis 1, here it is.
quote: Please show where the claims you made are in Genesis 1 or stop posting falsehoods.Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
You appear to have forgotten to include several other eras. Planck Era Grand unification Era Electroweak Era Matter domination Era Recombination Era So - that brings the number of eras to at least 12.And I am sure that there are more... They were not forgotten, but the particular source chosen from those available subjectively grouped them as seven major events as the Chart I used illustrated. I am using the opportunity to chose those classifications that duplicate the favorite numbers of the bible whenever I have such an opportunity. But seven does appear inordinately often in Science anyway, so we will see that the parallel is perhaps a usful educational and mnemonic device. Here is a totally different source which likewise uses this division of the Big Bang Beginning into seven major events:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
Your own source said "a day (24 hour period) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1"
1) Oh,...OK. Stay on but don't hammer your dissent repetitiously after i have told why I understand things to be interpreted idifferently than you do, and i will not criticize you again and again for what i believe is a foolish mistake on your part. 2) Yes, Strong tells us to use the context in order to determine whether yowm means an earth day or some other duration, like an Era. I agree with his suggestion but differ with him in that the context of the whole firat chapter specifically tells us the seven days were different because there was no Solar Clock until the 4th duration. 3) If the 4th duration had already been a 24 hour unit of time, the whole of Gen 1:14-19 would be unnecessary information.That God made the Sun the authority over Earth Time on that separate event makes it clear to me. I also find the unusual description of a day as represented as an "evening and morning" a hint that these seven days are somewhat important things to reconsider.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NoNukes Inactive Member |
How could day four be the creation of an Earth clock if it corresponds to an age when neither the sun or the solar system existed.
in this otherwise step-by-step unfolding Surely you are not suggesting that day four is the only step out of chronilogical order. How did plants exist before there were even galaxies. And the Bible says nothing about tectonic plates. Those are your words. Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846) The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison. If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
kofh2u Member (Idle past 3848 days) Posts: 1162 From: phila., PA Joined: |
Please point out where Genesis 1 says (Father Nature, the first cause) or (Panthalassa) or (Pangea/Rodinia) or (composed of the Seven Large Tectonic Plates). In case you have not read Genesis 1, here it is. ?What Genesis says is separated from myown parenthetical interjections in the grammatically correct fashion of bracketing explanations within the context of its passages. The reader can clearly understand what Genesis says and where explanations and commentary are sourced elsewhere. Edited by kofh2u, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
But the authors of Genesis 1 had no clue what caused the periods of light or darkness as is pointed out in Genesis 1. Have you every read Genesis 1?
The Sun and Moon were simply to rule day and night, not cause day and night. They were just lights in the sky. The author of Genesis 1 simply didn't have a clue what caused light and even thought that the moon was a "light", yet another indication that no one should think of Genesis 1 as being factual or in any way a "science' text. Edited by jar, : appalin spallin left out a "t"Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
So you admit that Geneswis 1 does not say what you claim. In fact Genesis 1 never even implies that all the land was gathered into one place.
Have you ever read Genesis?
quote: Note it is the waters that get gathered together, not land.Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024