What I've never understood is why and how the proponents of ID conclude that it is the only option to current biological understanding. Also it does not seem to matter much if the ID is in no way form or fashion falsifiable, if the ID has never produced a single original thought but only pathetic rebuttals and if the inherent dishonest nature of the ID so nicely portrayed in the Wedge Document is called out in the open.
Altogether I'd be willing to conclude that the proponents of ID are intellectually dishonest and are only doing that because of their religion. There is nothing admirable about that, nothing at all.
™ Version 4.2