The descriptor "junk" gives us additional information, that the stretch of DNA in question shows no signs of positive or negative selection.
But the problem is that it is not clear any such thing exists. I linked earlier to [/url=
http://genomics.princeton.edu/...files/Haddrill_etal2008.pdf]a study[/url] that tested neutrality of non-coding DNA in two species of
Drosophila. Their conclusion (emphasis mine):
quote:
In summary, we have examined patterns of evolution at several classes of noncoding DNA in D. simulans and find that all noncoding DNA is subject to the action of negative selection, indicated by low levels of polymorphism and divergence and a skew in the frequency spectrum toward rare variants.
I lack the expertise to assess the maths behind their claims, but if they're right then we can see detectable evidence of negative selection against changes in non-coding DNA. They also claim evidence of positive selection in untranslated DNA in
Drosophila simuans.