Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kofh2u spam
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3840 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 2 of 12 (693061)
03-10-2013 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Eli
03-10-2013 2:21 PM


Yeah, yeah, yeah...
If the post was to the same person, perhaps.
But when the same dumb question or load issue is raised by other peoole, spamming their own wrong stuff, they get back the same answer because that IS THE CORRECT ANSWER.
What you like is moderation that silences Free Sppecch and thereby serves your one sided indefensible crap.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Eli, posted 03-10-2013 2:21 PM Eli has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 3:05 PM kofh2u has replied
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 03-10-2013 4:45 PM kofh2u has replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3840 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 6 of 12 (693078)
03-10-2013 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Admin
03-10-2013 4:45 PM


...analogy and correspondences are derived for illustration purposes...
I did respond then and do so now.
The very purpose of the chart is to illustrate the analogy between what science says as itemized with aows and compared with the names under each entity as mentioned in Genesis.
You may not agree with the comparision and correspindences, but that is neither here or there in regard to my point.
I am certain that the athesits and anti-genesis people seek to censor and ignore these correspondences and analogies, but that is understandable since they can not otherwise dispute the Genesis may well be in agreement with science.
Please bring this answer to the attention of some impartial administrator so we can finalize the issue between yoursel and me, since I consider you bias and subjectively influenced against any point I may bring to your attention.
Thank you in advance of such courtesy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 03-10-2013 4:45 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Eli, posted 03-10-2013 6:43 PM kofh2u has not replied
 Message 11 by Admin, posted 03-10-2013 8:12 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3840 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 7 of 12 (693083)
03-10-2013 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by CoolBeans
03-10-2013 3:05 PM


...right now it corresponds...
You know I look at that picture, but I cant stop thinking. What if we find more homind fossils of our evolutionary tree? What would happen to your explanation of the evidence?
Right now is what matters since right now I am drawing attention to the one-to-one corresponence and the recent science publication that says the same thing.
Since you get the point, I rest my case about the legitimacy of showing the analogy with evolution of man.
See me when the sciences say there were 50 links or ten.
An analogy is very proper too, because everything Jesus ever said was in the same gendre, called parables.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 3:05 PM CoolBeans has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024