You do not consider DNA viruses as life then.
Following that, your previous description of what you regard as "life" doesn't make sense. I'll repeat part of your post for you.
Albert de Roos writes:
I use the word Life in a purely mechanistic way and I propose that a replicating genome can be considered the first life form. Replication of a genome is the common denominator of all life and the basis of its evolution.
I propose that we have a workable definition of "Life' before this thread can start properly and before I can start learning from the specialists.
I have seen how cdesign proponentsists tend to move the goalposts on the description of the word "Life" when it suits them....to such an extent that the word "Life" becomes meaningless (I think that they do it to ensure that their favourite designers can be classified as Life, even though they are supposed to be spooks).
Edited by Pressie, : Spelling and last paragraph