Sexual v asexual reproduction shows design more-so than evolution. Evolution could have found a better way to allow for more anti-bodies and viral resistance than to make 2 different sets of organs, separate hormone levels, etc. There are the standard evolution talking points, but the complexity of nature is too much to LOGICALLY discount a designer.
Where did natural selection get it's intelligence?
Where did the intelligence come from to make the different sexes?
Replies to this message: |
| Message 337 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-26-2014 8:50 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 338 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-26-2014 8:53 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 339 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-26-2014 8:57 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 340 by DrJones*, posted 07-26-2014 9:04 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 341 by ringo, posted 07-27-2014 2:44 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 342 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-27-2014 2:55 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 343 by RAZD, posted 07-27-2014 8:53 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 345 by Pressie, posted 07-28-2014 8:15 AM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 346 by Taq, posted 07-28-2014 1:46 PM | | mram10 has not replied |
| Message 347 by Dogmafood, posted 07-28-2014 11:53 PM | | mram10 has not replied |