Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The smoldering of EVC
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 21 of 168 (715022)
12-31-2013 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Bolder-dash
12-30-2013 9:13 PM


It is with a certain amount of glee that I watch the now complete decline of a website that once purported to be an inclusive forum for rational debate concerning evolution and creation. As we can now clearly see, that no longer exists, although in reality it never did, it just was a better illusion before, because they had topic names that actually looked like places where people could debate. That was never true, you never could debate, because Percy wouldn't allow that, but it looked like you could if you were a first time visitor. Ha, good riddance to that. Now look what you have:
Is religion good for us.
Why the flood never happened.
Do we need God.
Have you ever read Ephesians
Bible and Plagerism.
Was Jesus's crucification all part of God's plan.
We invented Jesus Christ.....
Oh how it amuses me. Percy's evil little plan has wrought his own little bible study group. And Dr. A and Coyote are his altar boys. Ho ho ho.
I like to think I played no small part in exposing the fraud of this website for what it was. A poorly executed mouthpiece for Percy to attempt to convince the fence sitters to join his church of wounded pilgrims. They pretended they wanted to discuss science, but Percy made sure that would never be allowed, by silencing all detractors of his world view, and giving harsh warning to the rest about making sure you toe the party line. Dissent will not be tolerated in Percy's little cocoon. Tar and feather the evolutionist doubters if you must, but just make sure no one can trace the tar back to him. But don't worry, HE will protect you.
But that's what can be great about the internet, it can expose the truth, no matter how much someone tries to grab a monopoly of it. Percy wanted to post his propaganda with just enough disguise to try to trick the unsure comrades, but eventually his banana republic couldn't keep the doubters from fleeing. He said, this is my site, and I will post whatever false information I want, because heck, its free advertising for how I want the world to be. So now he has exactly the world he created, a bible mock group. Oh the joy.
I called you on it Percy, and being vindicated is kind of fun. You were warned repeatedly. Now you have been banished to your own island. You don't own science, it goes on with out you.
That was incoherent. What it chiefly seems to communicate is that you're still nuts. This is not really news, and could have been said with greater economy of language.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Bolder-dash, posted 12-30-2013 9:13 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 45 of 168 (715164)
01-01-2014 10:06 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by marc9000
01-01-2014 9:54 PM


Re: The smoldering of EvC
Your wholesale ignorance of science might make for a good thread topic. That is, if you actually believe what you're saying.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by marc9000, posted 01-01-2014 9:54 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 82 of 168 (715249)
01-02-2014 3:50 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Faith
01-02-2014 7:47 AM


Re: The smoldering of EvC
As has been said before, too bad you don't seem to remember such things, Creationists hardly ever share the same point of view ...
Oh, there are some views they share.
* They all think they're speaking on God's behalf.
* They all think they're guided by supernatural wisdom rather then their fallible human intellects.
* They all think that anyone who disagrees with them is a moron, an atheist liar, possessed by Satan, etc.
* They all think that they're unquestionably right.
But apart from that, they do exhibit a remarkable diversity of opinion. Perhaps that should tell you something, Faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 01-02-2014 7:47 AM Faith has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 83 of 168 (715250)
01-02-2014 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Faith
01-02-2014 7:39 AM


Re: The smoldering of EvC
You guys just don't get it. You CANNOT apply classical scientific method to the UNWITNESSED PAST.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Faith, posted 01-02-2014 7:39 AM Faith has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(3)
Message 128 of 168 (715460)
01-05-2014 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Faith
01-05-2014 7:01 AM


Re: The Unwitnessed / Prehistoric Past
There are plenty of witnesses of all kinds to help the forensic investigator decipher the clues of a case. There are legal documents, case histories, and yes even scientific documents that may help in a particular case and are in the sense I'm using the word "witnesses."
If, in Faithspeak, scientific documents count as "witnesses", then in what sense is the prehistoric past unwitnessed? There are lots of scientific documents telling us about it ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 7:01 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 6:26 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 134 of 168 (715487)
01-05-2014 8:38 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Faith
01-05-2014 6:26 PM


Re: The Unwitnessed / Prehistoric Past
The documents are not FROM the time in question, or close enough to be authoritative ...
How close in time does a document have to be to be authoritative, and why? Do the facts have a "best before" date?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 6:26 PM Faith has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(8)
Message 137 of 168 (715496)
01-05-2014 9:04 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by RAZD
01-05-2014 8:43 PM


Re: Proposed Thread: Two types of science
I'm not sure what you mean. I've never heard of the field of atheist science -- what do they study?
Reality. The bastards.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by RAZD, posted 01-05-2014 8:43 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by RAZD, posted 01-05-2014 9:39 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024