Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   hello from messenjah of one
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1524 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


(1)
Message 31 of 35 (717013)
01-23-2014 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Larni
01-23-2014 6:22 AM



"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Larni, posted 01-23-2014 6:22 AM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 32 of 35 (717064)
01-23-2014 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Phat
01-23-2014 12:23 AM


Re: Choice
It is if you want to increase the chance that your decision will be rational.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Phat, posted 01-23-2014 12:23 AM Phat has not replied

  
Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1260 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 33 of 35 (717085)
01-24-2014 1:26 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Larni
01-23-2014 6:22 AM


"there will be light"
john 1:1

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Larni, posted 01-23-2014 6:22 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Larni, posted 01-24-2014 3:35 AM Trump won has not replied
 Message 35 by Theodoric, posted 01-24-2014 9:46 AM Trump won has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 184 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 34 of 35 (717086)
01-24-2014 3:35 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Trump won
01-24-2014 1:26 AM


How is that evidence? I asked how Jesus could know if I were an idiot: you then saying that the phrase 'let there be light' is evidence for this assertion does not follow.
Unless you are trying to be sophomoric.
All the best.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Trump won, posted 01-24-2014 1:26 AM Trump won has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9140
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


(1)
Message 35 of 35 (717094)
01-24-2014 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Trump won
01-24-2014 1:26 AM


john who?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Trump won, posted 01-24-2014 1:26 AM Trump won has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024