Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,811 Year: 4,068/9,624 Month: 939/974 Week: 266/286 Day: 27/46 Hour: 2/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.
ooh-child
Member (Idle past 371 days)
Posts: 242
Joined: 04-10-2009

Normal Thread Display
Message 25 of 614 (718435)
02-06-2014 4:33 PM 		Reply to: Message 22 by Diomedes
02-06-2014 3:54 PM

Re: How about forensic science?
I guess that also begs the question: if ' historical science' is unreliable, as Creationists stipulate, then how can they have such a dogmatic adherence to what is written in the Bible?
​
Let me play devil's advocate here - the Bible is the inerrant word of God, silly. Says so right in the book. Everything in it is inspired by a perfect being, therefore, it is perfect. Besides, God was there.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Diomedes, posted 02-06-2014 3:54 PM Diomedes has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Diomedes, posted 02-06-2014 7:03 PM ooh-child has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024