Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

Three Curtains

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Three Curtains
Larni
Member (Idle past 182 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 4 of 48 (729250)
06-07-2014 11:06 AM 		Reply to: Message 3 by rstrats
06-07-2014 10:20 AM

I never really got this when I heard about it.
​
Once the 3rd option is removed and you have the chance to change it becomes 1 in 2 regardless of whether you change your decision because you are making a decision not to change in the same way the you would need to make a decision to change.
​
It's just one more way for God to limit our free will
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by rstrats, posted 06-07-2014 10:20 AM rstrats has seen this message but not replied
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 182 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 40 of 48 (729356)
06-10-2014 9:18 AM 		Reply to: Message 6 by Modulous
06-07-2014 1:56 PM

Oh, I see now.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 06-07-2014 1:56 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 182 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 41 of 48 (729357)
06-10-2014 9:20 AM 		Reply to: Message 24 by rstrats
06-08-2014 4:01 PM

Re: Three Curtains
That game uses doors, whereas the OP game uses curtains.
​
Pure genius.
​
You made my day with that.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by rstrats, posted 06-08-2014 4:01 PM rstrats has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024