Continuation of Flood Discussion

Sorry, you are absolutely wrong (again).We have a tremendous number of archaeological sites dating to that time period--I've examined probably over a hundred myself. There is no evidence of a large flood anywhere near that time period.We have a number of great examples of DNA continuity from before that date to after it, with more being produced every week. I even have one from my own personal research, a link from about 5,300 years ago to a living individual in the same area. The mtDNA from Noah's female associates did not replace the older Native American mtDNA. That continuity alone disproves the flood idea at about 4,350 years ago.You can quibble about dating all you want, but various threads on this site have shown your quibbles are wrong. The dating of those time periods is accurate and all the creationists' "what ifs" have not managed to change that.As Heinlein noted, "Belief gets in the way of learning." You're the poster child for that concept.

A worldwide flood would break the continuity of mtDNA, with replacement from Noah's female kin's mtDNA.We do not see this.We see continuity of mtDNA across the 4,350 time period assigned to the flood. Its so easy to get that I even have an example from my own archaeological research. (I posted this upthread, but you ignored it.)And don't quibble about the dating--that's a settled issue.

Since you are trying to ignore this, I'll repost it. Again.-------------A worldwide flood would break the continuity of mtDNA, with replacement from Noah's female kin's mtDNA.We do not see this.We see continuity of mtDNA across the 4,350 time period assigned to the flood. Its so easy to get that I even have an example from my own archaeological research. (I posted this upthread, but you ignored it.)And don't quibble about the dating--that's a settled issue.

You should be very interested in time, as time has everything to do with the things we are all discussing.You are trying to compress time by a factor of some 5000 to 50,000x from what everyone else has concluded so you don't just get to hand-wave it all away. You have demonstrated time and again that it is you who can't think outside of the box. You are willing to ignore or obfuscate any data that disagrees with your religious belief.You made yourself not just blind, but deaf and dumb besides.