Climate Change Denier comes in from the cold: SCIENCE!!!

Al Gore predicted the polar caps would be gone by now.

But I have a question that you might can clear up for me.

You did not answer my question. I did not ask what the conditions were in 2008.I asked how NoNukes would explain the fact that in May of 2015 the polar ice was 5% larger than it was in 1979.What does an article from 2008 have to do with the Polar ice in May of 2015?

Are you sure he did not make that prediction in his acceptance speech of his nobel prize in 2007?

There was 170,000 sq miles more polar ice this year than there was in 1979.

My argument is that there is 170,000 sq miles more polar ice in 2015 than there was in 1979 when it was first recorded.

Ward is saying that waves only exist in matter and the matter must have bonds between them as we see in solids and liquids. There are no such bonds between molecules of gas and exist only fleetingly as gas molecules pass each other at great speeds. Therefore, according to Ward, it is erroneous to make calculations of energy assuming radiation exists as waves. Ward says radiation exists purely as frequency in free space and within gases and the only correct way to calculate its energy is through Plank's equation. This makes UV radiation much more energetic than infrared. As you pointed out however, for UV to take prominence over infrared in causing global warming, it must be shown that its flux ( quantity per square meter ) is at least close to that of infrared. I have not determined that yet. If it can be shown that mid level UV flux striking earths surface in the late 20 th century was at least on the same order of magnitude as infrared during that time, would you be willing to say your confidence in co2 as the prime cause of global warming is less than 50% ?

I have not determined that yet. If it can be shown that mid level UV flux striking earths surface in the late 20 th century was at least on the same order of magnitude as infrared during that time, would you be willing to say your confidence in co2 as the prime cause of global warming is less than 50% ?

Perhaps the accepted physics is erroneous?

Do you believe that radiation exists as waves in space? Do you believe waves don't need a medium to travel in?

So you believe light exists between source and where it illuminates an object? Where is your evidence??

If that is your belief, your taxes should be 100%, if not more. That would be really great, right?

Foreveryoung,
Nothing like having the perspective of the last 600 million years in relation to climate as opposed to looking at the last 150 years with blinders on.So using the Vostek ice core data no one here can show/prove a relationship between CO2 and the Earth's temperature.The Earth's main greenhouse gas is water vapor responsible for 97% of the greenhouse gas effect (the EPA says 95%). But there is no easy way to tax water vapor.That is not the case with CO2, as there are many ways this can be taxed. As Michael Faraday replied to a MP who asked what good is this knowledge, Mike responded "You may be able to figure out a way to tax it" or something along those lines.This CO2, AGW thing is just a way to tax people..............so loved by the big government types.

He explains why the Arhennius theory of the greenhouse effect is a fiction in that it confuses the cause with the effect where the actual cause is the gravito-thermal greenhouse effect and the actual effect is the IR absorption and emission of IR active greenhouse gases. The gravito-thermal greenhouse effect is described in detail in the peer-reviewed paper (the 33C gravito-thermal greenhouse effect of Maxwell, Clausius, Carnot, Boltzmann, Feynman, US Standard Atmosphere, the HS greenhouse equation, et al). This paper gives the real reason for the 33C difference between an earth with no atmosphere and an earth with its present atmosphere as opposed to the one espoused as "common knowledge".

I take this to mean that man made additions of carbon dioxide warm the planet. Where is your proof?

And how does this constitute proof? Show your work.