Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 114 (8789 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 09-20-2017 9:27 PM
357 online now:
anglagard, Coyote, DrJones*, NoNukes (4 members, 353 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Porkncheese
Post Volume:
Total: 819,192 Year: 23,798/21,208 Month: 1,763/2,468 Week: 272/822 Day: 65/82 Hour: 1/1

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1234
5
6Next
Author Topic:   Open-minded Skepticism
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 52 days)
Posts: 1493
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 61 of 85 (759466)
06-11-2015 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by mikechell
06-11-2015 4:11 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
I already said I don't think it's true that beliefs can change facts, so I don't know why you're beating that drum.

But did anyone here ever say that Facts mean nothing, mike? If not, why even bring it up?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 4:11 PM mikechell has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 6:49 PM MrHambre has responded

    
mikechell
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 85 (759468)
06-11-2015 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by MrHambre
06-11-2015 4:24 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
I am not beating any drum. I was ... when I was stating what I know to be the definition of a fact.
From the dictionary ...
noun:
1. something that actually exists; reality; truth

2. something known to exist or to have happened

3. a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true

But since you've all "piled on" to push your point that a fact is indeed NOT concrete, I've put down the drum. It's you who still wants to argue a pointless "fact".


evidence over faith ... observation over theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by MrHambre, posted 06-11-2015 4:24 PM MrHambre has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by MrHambre, posted 06-11-2015 7:29 PM mikechell has responded

  
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 52 days)
Posts: 1493
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 63 of 85 (759469)
06-11-2015 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by mikechell
06-11-2015 6:49 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
mikechell writes:

But since you've all "piled on" to push your point that a fact is indeed NOT concrete, I've put down the drum. It's you who still wants to argue a pointless "fact".


I don't consider it a pointless fact that our knowledge depends on context. It's not a pointless fact that truth is culturally constructed.

But they are facts.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 6:49 PM mikechell has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by jar, posted 06-11-2015 7:45 PM MrHambre has not yet responded
 Message 65 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 8:10 PM MrHambre has not yet responded

    
jar
Member
Posts: 29363
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 3.2


(2)
Message 64 of 85 (759470)
06-11-2015 7:45 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by MrHambre
06-11-2015 7:29 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
The sun rises and sets; true fact but false.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by MrHambre, posted 06-11-2015 7:29 PM MrHambre has not yet responded

  
mikechell
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 85 (759473)
06-11-2015 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by MrHambre
06-11-2015 7:29 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
I don't consider it a pointless fact that our knowledge depends on context. It's not a pointless fact that truth is culturally constructed.

Again ... I will point out that a fact is a hard, cold truth that shapes the way we think. The way we think does not change the fact. You cannot call a thought, or an idea, or a half truth ... a fact. Once it is a set, repeatable truth or result, only then can it be considered a fact.

The sun rises and sets; true fact but false.

It is NOT a true fact. The FACT is that the Earth rotates. Just because someone wants to BELIEVE the sun rises and sets does NOT make it a fact.

evidence over faith ... observation over theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by MrHambre, posted 06-11-2015 7:29 PM MrHambre has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by jar, posted 06-11-2015 9:21 PM mikechell has responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 29363
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 3.2


(3)
Message 66 of 85 (759476)
06-11-2015 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by mikechell
06-11-2015 8:10 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
It is NOT a true fact. The FACT is that the Earth rotates. Just because someone wants to BELIEVE the sun rises and sets does NOT make it a fact.

I've been fortunate enough to have lived on the East coast of the US as well as the West coast of the US and it is a fact that I have seen the sun rise in the East and set in the West.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 8:10 PM mikechell has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 10:58 PM jar has not yet responded

  
mikechell
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 85 (759481)
06-11-2015 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by jar
06-11-2015 9:21 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
... fact that I have seen the sun rise in the East and set in the West.

Um ... no, it is a perception that you've seen these things. The FACT is that you were stationary on a rotating planet as it moved YOU into position to see the Sun as it became visible to you.
But you know that, and you're just "did too, did not" bickering.. Your observation of the Sun's movement does not change the fact of the Earth's motion.

evidence over faith ... observation over theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by jar, posted 06-11-2015 9:21 PM jar has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by MrHambre, posted 06-12-2015 5:27 AM mikechell has not yet responded
 Message 71 by 1.61803, posted 06-12-2015 10:36 AM mikechell has responded

  
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 52 days)
Posts: 1493
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


(2)
Message 68 of 85 (759496)
06-12-2015 5:27 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by mikechell
06-11-2015 10:58 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
mikechell writes:

Your observation of the Sun's movement does not change the fact of the Earth's motion.

The point is that they're both "facts." We observe the Sun rising out of the eastern horizon and drop into the western horizon with such regularity that you could form testable predictions out of the phenomenon. As for the Earth's rotation, that's a scientific theory that humans created to explain observations like solar "motion." You consider the theory a fact even though it contradicts our observations.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 10:58 PM mikechell has not yet responded

    
mikechell
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 85 (759498)
06-12-2015 6:54 AM


I'll try this again ...
According to YOU, facts mean nothing.
As for the Earth's rotation, that's a scientific theory that humans created to explain observations like solar "motion." You consider the theory a fact even though it contradicts our observations.

We can bicker all we want. Obviously, I can't change your mind.
I say, a fact is irrefutable ... based on real data.
You say, nu huh ... it could mean anything based on observation.

does too ... does not ... does too blah blah blah
The Earth rotates. There are multitudes of data that will prove that. It's fact.
You seeing the sun rise and set does NOT change the fact. There is only your observation, and no other proof. Observation does NOT change fact. The FACT that the Earth rotates DOES change the observation ... if you're smart enough to use it.

Edited by mikechell, : No reason given.


evidence over faith ... observation over theory

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Jon, posted 06-12-2015 8:05 AM mikechell has not yet responded

  
Jon
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 70 of 85 (759499)
06-12-2015 8:05 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by mikechell
06-12-2015 6:54 AM


Re: I'll try this again ...
I say, a fact is irrefutable

If a fact is irrefutable then it has no place in science.

What's more, it would mean that there are, essentially, no such things as 'facts', since history has shown us that pretty much everything we've known at any particular time has eventually been shown to be wrong in some way and that everything we know today will also likely be shown wrong at some time in the future.

So it is you who think facts mean nothing. Everyone else here, by understanding facts in their context and relationship to us and what we already know, appreciates the way facts weave together with our lives, our experiences, and our prejudices to create deeper understandings of the world around us.

Observation does NOT change fact.

Your understanding of 'fact' is entirely useless.


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by mikechell, posted 06-12-2015 6:54 AM mikechell has not yet responded

  
1.61803
Member
Posts: 2713
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004
Member Rating: 2.5


(1)
Message 71 of 85 (759510)
06-12-2015 10:36 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by mikechell
06-11-2015 10:58 PM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
Hi Mike,
Facts can change, example: It is a fact that the white rhino exist in Africa.
In the near future it may also be a fact that it has become extinct.
Right? Oh so right now it is a fact that it is extant. But you see how easily facts can change depending on conditions and perceptions and a whole host of things.

I think you may be conflating a fact with the natural laws of the universe/physics which so far as we know are immutable. (*with caveats in quantum physics)

Facts are important in that they set the bar on what we all can agree is true. But just as the above example; those things are not set in stone regardless of how hard you cling to them.
That is all folks are saying.

If you are in a room and I show you a green ball and asked you what color is the ball? You would say it is green. If I get a hundred people to tell me the color they would say it is green. So the ball is green, a matter of fact. But is it? No, the ball is actually yellow and I have been shining a blue light from above on the ball. So where does that fact lie?


"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by mikechell, posted 06-11-2015 10:58 PM mikechell has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Jon, posted 06-12-2015 1:45 PM 1.61803 has not yet responded
 Message 73 by mikechell, posted 06-13-2015 9:29 AM 1.61803 has not yet responded

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 85 (759519)
06-12-2015 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by 1.61803
06-12-2015 10:36 AM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
I bought a pack of small yellow notebooks once. Used them for writing everything. Then one day I noticed that the package called them "green". What the hell?

So I pointed it out to my girlfriend, "Look, these things say that they're green."

"That's because they are," she said.


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by 1.61803, posted 06-12-2015 10:36 AM 1.61803 has not yet responded

  
mikechell
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 85 (759570)
06-13-2015 9:29 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by 1.61803
06-12-2015 10:36 AM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
It is a fact that the white rhino exist in Africa.

[qs]In the near future it may also be a fact that it has become extinct.[qs]
The second statement does not change the fact of the first statement. Just because a fact is no longer relevant does not change the fact. I agree, there are suppositions that are called "fact" even though they aren't.
If I get a hundred people to tell me the color they would say it is green.

Is the observation that did NOT change the fact that:
the ball is actually yellow and I have been shining a blue light from above on the ball.

You've pointed out my point precisely, thank you. The FACT is that the ball is yellow . The second FACT is that there is a blue light shining on it. The OBSERVATION that said it was green is not and never was a fact.
Observation alone does not change a fact. Once the true facts are known, the observation that a blue light shining on a yellow ball will make it look green is also a repeatable, observable bit of data that supports the fact. Change the facts, and the observation will change. Changing the observation will not change the facts.


evidence over faith ... observation over theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by 1.61803, posted 06-12-2015 10:36 AM 1.61803 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Jon, posted 06-13-2015 10:07 AM mikechell has not yet responded

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 85 (759575)
06-13-2015 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by mikechell
06-13-2015 9:29 AM


Re: Okay ... I'll give up.
Once the true facts are known

How can we know that we know a 'true fact' and how can we know that the fact is 'true'?

Changing the observation will not change the facts.

How exactly do you think we get facts?

Because we either gather them through observation of the world around us or make them up in our heads.

Which one is it?


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by mikechell, posted 06-13-2015 9:29 AM mikechell has not yet responded

  
mikechell
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 85 (759580)
06-13-2015 10:40 AM


bicker, bicker, bicker ...
I haven't had this kind of conversation since I was 8 and arguing with my 6 year old sister.
How exactly do you think we get facts?

Because we either gather them through observation of the world around us or make them up in our heads.

Seeing the ball is green, one time, and saying that is a "fact" is making things up in your head.
Take the ball to another room, it's yellow. Take it back, it's green. Huh, observation just proved that the ball is NOT green. Take the ball and the light to another room, the ball is now green. Increasing our knowledge base. If we keep gathering knowledge, we will eventually find that the ball IS yellow (fact) and the blue light makes it look green (fact). From that point, those two facts have been set. No other observations will change that, so you cannot,

make them up in our heads
that the ball is red ... and suddenly change the fact that the ball is yellow!!!
Observations REVEAL the facts ... they don't CREATE them.

evidence over faith ... observation over theory

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Jon, posted 06-13-2015 11:29 AM mikechell has responded

  
Prev1234
5
6Next
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017