He predicted that animals will produce after their own kind. He predicted that a canine will give birth only to a canine--never to a porcupine, monkey, or any other animal; that a feline will give birth to a feline; and, that a coelacanth will only come from another coelacanth. He wrote in his own words that a coelacanth will never morph into something other than what it is.
So what is your point here? Why would anyone ever expect a canine to give birth "to a porcupine, monkey, or any other animal"? Do you think that anybody exists who would seriously expect a canine to give birth "to a porcupine, monkey, or any other animal"? If you do think that, then who do you think would expect that and why?
I have been studying "creation science" since 1981 and discussing it with creationists since 1985. I have seen that claim presented many times, but whenever I would try to discuss it with a creationist he always accusing me of making it up -- or else he would refuse to respond at all. Now here you are making that same claim, so you cannot use the typical tactic of denying that any creationist would make that claim. And hopefully you will not refuse to respond to my questions at all.
I am quite serious about those questions and I do want to get your answers and to discuss them with you.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
