Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,795 Year: 4,052/9,624 Month: 923/974 Week: 250/286 Day: 11/46 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution. We Have The Fossils. We Win.
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 273 of 2887 (773968)
12-11-2015 2:12 PM


You have the fossils?
Do you have the fossils of giant human beings that have been found all over the earth? Did we shrink?

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by Theodoric, posted 12-11-2015 2:16 PM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 291 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-12-2015 2:12 PM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 275 of 2887 (773988)
12-12-2015 12:16 AM
Reply to: Message 274 by Theodoric
12-11-2015 2:16 PM


Theodoric writes:
No one has them. They don't exist.
So the images of giant bones I see on the internet (which look convincing) are all fake?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by Theodoric, posted 12-11-2015 2:16 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by AZPaul3, posted 12-12-2015 1:18 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 278 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-12-2015 2:10 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 281 of 2887 (773997)
12-12-2015 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 279 by AZPaul3
12-12-2015 3:08 AM


AZPaul3 writes:
I know some weird people who mistake, maybe willingly, dinosaur bones as giant human bones for religious reasons.
Well if you can have giant lizards, why not have giant humans.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by AZPaul3, posted 12-12-2015 3:08 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 282 by Tangle, posted 12-12-2015 6:16 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 283 by AZPaul3, posted 12-12-2015 6:47 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 284 by JonF, posted 12-12-2015 7:48 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 286 by ringo, posted 12-12-2015 11:20 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 287 of 2887 (774019)
12-12-2015 11:27 AM
Reply to: Message 285 by JonF
12-12-2015 7:50 AM


Claim: The skeleton of a giant human was uncovered during gas exploration in Saudi Arabia.
Well the giants would satisfactorily explain the megalithic construction at Cusco in Peru; the site known as the Sacsayhauman, huge rocks carved out perfectly, earthquake resistant and defying even modern day masonry. A human of the size in the photo however, would make short work of it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 285 by JonF, posted 12-12-2015 7:50 AM JonF has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Percy, posted 12-12-2015 12:41 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 289 by AZPaul3, posted 12-12-2015 12:41 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 290 by Coyote, posted 12-12-2015 1:08 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 292 by dwise1, posted 12-12-2015 6:43 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 293 of 2887 (774076)
12-13-2015 6:12 AM
Reply to: Message 291 by Dr Adequate
12-12-2015 2:12 PM


Dr Adequate writes:
No. Nor does anyone else. 'Cos they don't exist.
If I said elongated skulls have been found would you say that those don't exist too?
Anyway here is a link -->
Initial DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull released — with incredible results | Ancient Origins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-12-2015 2:12 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 6:38 AM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 295 by AZPaul3, posted 12-13-2015 7:11 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 300 by Coyote, posted 12-13-2015 9:01 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 307 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 9:47 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 296 of 2887 (774079)
12-13-2015 7:23 AM
Reply to: Message 294 by Percy
12-13-2015 6:38 AM


Percy writes:
Of course elongated skulls exist. It's called head binding. Some cultures, for their own reasons, obviously thought it was appealing.
You obviously didn't bother to even look at my link. It clearly rules out head binding as the cause due to the cranial joins being in unusual places.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 6:38 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 297 by AZPaul3, posted 12-13-2015 8:01 AM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 298 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 8:33 AM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 299 of 2887 (774083)
12-13-2015 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 297 by AZPaul3
12-13-2015 8:01 AM


AZPaul writes:
How would anyone know this? The data is not being released. Any independent finding contrary to the BS presented would put a big dent in the tour business. Can't have that.
And yet Richard Dawkins wants me to visit his museums instead, to prove to myself that his version of events is the correct one. Can't you see the double standards?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by AZPaul3, posted 12-13-2015 8:01 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 301 by AZPaul3, posted 12-13-2015 9:09 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 309 by JonF, posted 12-13-2015 10:49 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 302 of 2887 (774089)
12-13-2015 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 298 by Percy
12-13-2015 8:33 AM


Percy writes:
Sure I did. Congratulations on believing just about anything you read, I guess.
So if an article can't even accurately report things as simple as volume and weight, are you really going to believe them
Well based on your logic I shouldn't believe you because if you can't even accurately read my links before banging on about head binding, then why would I listen to you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 298 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 8:33 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 304 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 9:38 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 303 of 2887 (774091)
12-13-2015 9:27 AM
Reply to: Message 297 by AZPaul3
12-13-2015 8:01 AM


AZPaul writes:
How would anyone know this? The data is not being released.
Would you release precious data to the globalists? Knowing full well that they will either destroy it, claim that it's a fake, discredit the source, or say it's no big deal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by AZPaul3, posted 12-13-2015 8:01 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 305 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 9:42 AM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 306 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 9:45 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 327 by AZPaul3, posted 12-13-2015 9:54 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 308 of 2887 (774102)
12-13-2015 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 305 by Tangle
12-13-2015 9:42 AM


Tangle writes:
There isn't a scientist on earth that wouldn't give an arm to be the first to scientifically find a new species of human. They'd be famous forevever. Don't you get this? It's the exact opposite of a conspiracy theory cover-up. Scientists absolutely love finding new stuff and proving old stuff wrong - they get prizes for it.
The globalists are the people who have all the money and the power (aka the elite). They decide if you get a prize or not, they decide if you get paid or not, they decide if your discovery is worthy or not. Don't you get this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 305 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 9:42 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 310 by Tanypteryx, posted 12-13-2015 10:55 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 311 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 10:56 AM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 312 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 11:29 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 324 by Percy, posted 12-13-2015 3:19 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 314 of 2887 (774110)
12-13-2015 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 311 by Tangle
12-13-2015 10:56 AM


Tangle writes:
But not covering them up well enough to stop them appearing in fake museums run by travel agents?
So you admit the fossils are genuine? Only the museum is fake but the bones are 100% bona fide.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 311 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 10:56 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 315 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 11:50 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 316 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 12:11 PM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 317 of 2887 (774117)
12-13-2015 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 316 by Tangle
12-13-2015 12:11 PM


Tangle writes:
These 'globalists' of yours are doing a really terrible job of preventing these discoveries. Is it just giants they don't like?
I'm not sure what the globalists like or don't like. But I can see on these forums that you guys didn't take kindly to the giant fossils. You begrudgingly accepted the elongated skull but only on the basis that it is deformed. So maybe it's you guys that don't like giants. Maybe because it suggests devolution rather than evolution.
And if the globalists are doing such a terrible job why can't I get you guys to believe in giants?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 12:11 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 318 by Tanypteryx, posted 12-13-2015 1:34 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 319 by Coyote, posted 12-13-2015 1:37 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 320 by ringo, posted 12-13-2015 1:38 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 321 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 2:30 PM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 322 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 3:01 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 323 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 3:16 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 332 by Pressie, posted 12-14-2015 7:20 AM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 346 by Theodoric, posted 12-14-2015 11:01 PM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 325 of 2887 (774139)
12-13-2015 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 321 by Tangle
12-13-2015 2:30 PM


Tangle writes:
I haven't accepted anything - I know nothing about them and neither does science or you
That's right you haven't accepted anything. Infact none of you guys have. You operate like a collective. Are you and your forum buddies just one massive entity? You all share the same views and opinions? What kind of group think is this? You do know the globalists are masters of mind-control?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by Tangle, posted 12-13-2015 2:30 PM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 326 by Tanypteryx, posted 12-13-2015 4:39 PM Big_Al35 has not replied
 Message 328 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 10:31 PM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 335 by Percy, posted 12-14-2015 8:47 AM Big_Al35 has replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 329 of 2887 (774160)
12-14-2015 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 328 by Dr Adequate
12-13-2015 10:31 PM


Dr Adequate writes:
Yes, why else do we all think that two plus two is four
Ahhh but I can prove that 2=1. Let me show you -
if a=b=1
then a=b; therefore a^2=ab; therefore a^2-b^2=ab-b^2
therefore (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
Now if we remove a-b from both sides we get a+b=b ie proof that 2=1

This message is a reply to:
 Message 328 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-13-2015 10:31 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 330 by NosyNed, posted 12-14-2015 3:23 AM Big_Al35 has replied
 Message 331 by Pressie, posted 12-14-2015 7:10 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Big_Al35
Member (Idle past 826 days)
Posts: 389
Joined: 06-02-2010


Message 334 of 2887 (774167)
12-14-2015 7:44 AM
Reply to: Message 330 by NosyNed
12-14-2015 3:23 AM


Re: there are rules
NosyNed writes:
and dividing by zero is prohibited because it produces stupid results like that one
Now what if I hadn't told you that a=b=1 but left all the rest of the calculation. That's algebra for you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 330 by NosyNed, posted 12-14-2015 3:23 AM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 336 by Percy, posted 12-14-2015 8:54 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024