Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Twitter Nerd-Fight Reveals a Long, Bizarre Scientific Feud
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4443
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.0


(1)
Message 1 of 16 (777683)
02-05-2016 6:44 PM


The editorial in the February issue of the scientific journal Cladistics reads Phylogenetic data sets submitted to this journal should be analysed using parsimony.
Twitter Nerd-Fight Reveals a Long, Bizarre Scientific Feud
quote:
If alternative methods give different results and the author prefers an unparsimonious topology, he or she is welcome to present that result, but should be prepared to defend it on philosophical grounds.
That did not go over well.
quote:
They said if you want to use another method, you have to show that it’s philosophically better, not scientifically better, says Jonathan Eisen, an evolutionary biologist at UC Davis. That’s why I said it seems like they’re dropping science for dogma.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AZPaul3, posted 02-05-2016 9:33 PM Tanypteryx has not replied
 Message 3 by Modulous, posted 02-06-2016 6:16 AM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024