Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 108 (8739 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-01-2017 12:21 AM
409 online now:
Coyote, Dr Adequate, Dredge, DrJones*, frako, Phat (AdminPhat) (6 members, 403 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jayhawker Soule
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminAsgara
Post Volume:
Total: 805,916 Year: 10,522/21,208 Month: 4/3,605 Week: 152/873 Day: 4/148 Hour: 4/9

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
2
Author Topic:   Dembski on Fundamentalism
jar
Member
Posts: 28702
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 16 of 22 (785316)
06-02-2016 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Faith
06-02-2016 9:37 AM


Re: Both YEC and OEC can exist only through willful ignorance.
Faith writes:

God of course considers those who deny the Flood to be the willfully ignorant:

2 Peter 3:5-6 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

Sorry but that does not support your assertion, only that the author of that passage was ignorant of much that we now know is true.

We have learned a few things in the last couple thousand years.

2 Peter is another great example of trying to compensate and make up excuses for other factual errors like the Biblical Flood stories or Exodus found in the Bible stories, particularly in this case the errors that were attributed to Jesus himself.

2 Peter was written at least thirty and perhaps as much as a century after Jesus death and it was necessary to try to market a possible even if not really plausible excuse for the absolute failure of Jesus promise to return during the lifetime of those who heard his prophecy. It's one of the earliest known examples of Apologetics.

AbE:

It is important to remember that 2 Peter is a great example of reality over scripture; of recognizing that the Bible stories are not without error and so some excuse must be created to explain the contradiction (in this case what Jesus said and the reality that He did not come back within the lifetime of those who heard Him say that) in some way that might almost stand up to examination or at least could be adopted by those who really wanted to maintain such a belief.

Reality is and always, when reality conflicts with what is written in the Bible stories it is reality that wins.

Edited by jar, : see AbE:


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Faith, posted 06-02-2016 9:37 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 12933
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 17 of 22 (785322)
06-02-2016 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by New Cat's Eye
06-01-2016 10:17 PM


Re: Both YEC and OEC can exist only through willful ignorance.
Cat Sci writes:

Special Creation and a literal Adam & Eve are as fully refuted as Young Earth or the Biblical Floods.

Resurrection too?

That would be an issue if fundamentalists were campaigning to teach Resurrection Science in public schools. But even fundamentalists are willing to keep a few miracles.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-01-2016 10:17 PM New Cat's Eye has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12439
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


(1)
Message 18 of 22 (785323)
06-02-2016 12:36 PM


Topic Reminder
Let's try to stay close to the topic, Dembski's views of fundamentalism. I'm asking for all posts to explain their tie-in to Dembski's views when not self-evidently about them.

One other thing: the topic is not Christian willful ignorance. Too many threads are being diverted onto this topic, and so I'm asking that all discussion involving Christian ignorance be confined to a single thread and am barring its discussion from all other threads from now on. If someone proposes a thread about Christian ignorance over at Proposed New Topics I'll get to it as quick as I can.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

    
NoNukes
Member
Posts: 9458
From: Central NC USA
Joined: 08-13-2010
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 19 of 22 (785327)
06-02-2016 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by PaulK
06-02-2016 8:04 AM


there has been little pushback from the ID movement or calls for academic freedom

Dembski is of course OEC. But isn't the ID movement pretty much YEC? Perhaps the explanation is that academic freedom as well as most of the ID movement is a sham as science; it is thinly veiled creationism with just enough methodology to enable writing a journal paper or two about peripheral topics.

ABE:

I was looking up articles on Dembski, and I came across this article on the Discovery Institute website. DI was very defensive of Dembski when he was having his issues at Baylor:

http://www.discovery.org/a/532

Plenty of complaining about the lack of academic freedom and even some expressions about compatibility with evolution from the DI folk. Perhaps their silence this time around is noteworthy.

Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.


Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)

History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King

If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams


This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by PaulK, posted 06-02-2016 8:04 AM PaulK has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by PaulK, posted 06-02-2016 1:52 PM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply
 Message 21 by kbertsche, posted 06-02-2016 6:29 PM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply

    
PaulK
Member
Posts: 12598
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 20 of 22 (785329)
06-02-2016 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by NoNukes
06-02-2016 1:38 PM


The ID leadership seems to be more OEC, but very tolerant of YEC. They do, I think, rely on YEC support which is why they tend not to push old Earth beliefs much.

The main reason the difference cones up is when they insist that the term "Creationist" means YEC (blaming the "Darwinists" of course) so they can deny being Creationists. Richard Sternberg used that gambit, expressly denying that he was a Young Earther as "proof" that he wasn't a Creationist despite his association with the YEC "Baraminology" group.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by NoNukes, posted 06-02-2016 1:38 PM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply

    
kbertsche
Member
Posts: 1359
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Joined: 05-10-2007
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 21 of 22 (785336)
06-02-2016 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by NoNukes
06-02-2016 1:38 PM


NoNukes writes:

Dembski is of course OEC. But isn't the ID movement pretty much YEC?


Not really. Phillip Johnson is arguably the father of the modern ID movement, and he is OEC. His idea was for the ID movement to be a "big tent" which would accommodate both YECs and OECs.

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Albert Einstein

I am very astonished that the scientific picture of the real world around me is very deficient. It gives us a lot of factual information, puts all of our experience in a magnificently consistent order, but it is ghastly silent about all and sundry that is really near to our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a word about red and blue, bitter and sweet, physical pain and physical delight; it knows nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, God and eternity. Science sometimes pretends to answer questions in these domains, but the answers are very often so silly that we are not inclined to take them seriously. Erwin Schroedinger


This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by NoNukes, posted 06-02-2016 1:38 PM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply

    
Dr Adequate
Member
Posts: 15807
Joined: 07-20-2006
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 22 of 22 (785346)
06-03-2016 1:01 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Faith
06-02-2016 9:37 AM


Re: Both YEC and OEC can exist only through willful ignorance.
God of course considers those who deny the Flood to be the willfully ignorant:

If God wants to post here, that would be great. Next time you talk to him, suggest that he joins the forums.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Faith, posted 06-02-2016 9:37 AM Faith has not yet responded

  
Prev1
2
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017