|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Assumptions involved in scientific dating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
What is the formula used to determine the age of materials? And what are the constant variables?
ThanksDOCJ
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
What assumptions are geologists making when dating rocks, etc? I'm wanting to find out the issues. It's just a matter of if one of you are going to provide them. I'm looking at the information and a few of the assumptions I'm seeing are how much daughter product was in the sample, how much parent was in the sample, that their model of gravitational physics is true, and I'm sure there are some inside the formula such as constant variables..
Thanks for all the information. Edited by DOCJ, : 😊
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I'm merely interested in the truth about dating methods. The age debate wouldn't refute my faith because it is adaptable. I generally view conventional science as a out dated way of thinking. I don't think all of the views are accurate in describing the universe. I'm just interested in the truth. In interpreting your response, it does seem as if you do not care about the accuracy of dating. It's as if you are fine with whatever. Which is fine but I'm more interested with the truth. And if you represent the main way of thinking I can definitely see why there is a debate. Christians who are in seek mode are looking to conclude in truth not on bias with regards to dating. If your attitude is a standard within the geology field, it's not a good thing. Every detail should matter, anchoring is unhealthy. FYI: I believe in the electrical model of the universe, birkeland currents, plasma physics, and accept gravitational physics as a weak force. Essentially the birkeland current would develop a universe that changes the composition of material, and the like due to the electrical current that would connect everything in the universe. There is absolutely no way to determine with out a doubt the age of the universe or the earth with conventional methods.
Electricverse Electric Sun NoBB Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I think the wording you prefer doesn't change the issue. There is plenty of evidence electric currents flow in the cosmos, and electric discharge will effect radioactive clocks.
Link Link 2 Link 3 Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : 😉
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
3 links provided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
You don't know that. Inflation within a big bang model has only circumstantial evidence. Redshift and the CMBR are circumstantial evidence to a big bang model per Lemaitre. It's a presumption that red shift is proof of distance and also that the CMBR is a proof of the size of the universe. Links provided in a previous post regarding the EU and some are below.
Inflation WMAP Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : 😂😂 Edited by DOCJ, : 🤣 Edited by DOCJ, : Edited after the conversation in order to clarify the points being argued Edited by DOCJ, : More clarification
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
My goal of providing a alternative valid narrative is providing truth (more data) AND in which not a single contrary valid argument from you regarding the points in the links has been posted. Making the assertion that I'm not looking for truth is irrelevant as the main narrative here is to provide reasonable doubt in the conventional dating methods. Since I have provided reasonable doubt in the links feel free to debate but you will inevitably not refute the points because they are mere evidence.
Enjoy Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I disagree. Truth is available. You just have to find it. Further it is truthful if you are objective AND provide data without the bias shrouding it. In doing so the interpreter is able to conclude truth. This idea that there is no truth is essentially a delusion unless you believe in idealism.
Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I don't need to defer to creationist points rooted in theology as you claim. The dispute is within the scientific community as I have referenced a few links proving it is within the scientific community. Honestly, it just is validating creationist thought.
Edited by DOCJ, : Err Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : 😁 Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Your argument is not scientific... It is emotional old man. ROFL.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
I disagree. Truth is the shedding of light, and I don't specifically mean in a theological sense. If person A is biased, and B, and they debate person C who is just spectating is seeing the bias. I'm merely attempting to point out that bias. I've said my point of view. I've also asked for your opinions. And soon I'll respond to Percy who has made a mess of things. I'm sure he is purposefully deceitful since it's clear he is conventional in his views, and would like to hate apparently vs being unbiased and debating as I have done.
Edited by DOCJ, : 😁
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Saying it's not scientific does not quantify to it not being scientific. Be more specific as to how per each point they make. FYI looking at the link. Anything you want me to look at?
Edited by DOCJ, : 😁
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Where is the contradiction? You quoted my belief system. I guess I can't have a belief and seek truth.
Edited by DOCJ, : 😁
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Right... Theories are mere falsehoods in science. And to some a theory will never refute theology. Roflol.
Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOCJ Inactive Member |
Please point out where I was incorrect. If you can't see the difference between my posts, it does shed some light on things.
Edited by DOCJ, : Clarification
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024