All three of your examples are provable, as the Flood is true history. (And can be proven mathematically to be significant)
What does 'can be proven mathematically to be significant' mean? Are you stating that you have some mathematical proof of the flood? Because I would like to see it.
Evolutionists claim that Dinosaurs were struck by comets is unprovable and almost on the verge of complete insanity and totally unscientific.
Right. But leaving the world in the hands of two horny teenagers and talking snakes is perfectly plausible.
Science and math and design prove creationism
Proof please?
Evolution does not abandon its premises of luck and chance even though it has never been proven and they have no evidence
Except that there is copious evidence. Read about Professor Lenski's work.
I back science, and rational thinking rather than the lucky chances and so called beneficial mutations put forth by religious evolutionists
Then you know nothing about science since 'lucky chances' and randomness are commonplace. Read a little more about how evolution truly works and while you are at it, read about quantum mechanics.
Science shows design, laws were not created by random chance, no laws are evolving.
Once again, PROOF PLEASE? And what do you mean by 'laws'? Are we now getting into legal arguments?
Science backs creationism as creationism shows design. Evolution is without design or purpose or clarity, just miraculous miracles of chance and luck.
And for the last time, PLEASE PROVIDE A PROOF. If science backs creationism, show us the peer reviewed material and experiments that validate this claim.
And on an aside, the 'miraculous miracles' are what exist in the realm of religion, not science. The bible is full of them. So if you take issue with miracles, you are going to have a tough time reconciling the bible with your views.