Atheism Cannot Rationally Explain Morals.

In the moral big picture of the Earth's ecology, are humans or bees more important (worth more)?If humans were eliminated from the Earth, would the Earth's ecology be better off or worse off?If bees were eliminated from the Earth, would the Earth's ecology be better off or worse off?I say humans are of negative worth and bees are of positive worth. Bees are of more worth than humans.Moose

BUMP!Anybody going to comment on my previous message?From a scientific (and general moral) perspective, bees are of far more worth than humans.Bees are essential or near essential for the good of the Earth's ecology, while humans have a gross negative impact.MooseEdited by Minnemooseus, : Change "Nobody" to "Anybody".

In message 612 I said: Agree or disagree? I think killing a human and killing a bee is equally immoral. Killing a human, however, is much more illegal.
^ See "Modified by edit", below. ^How about the killing of 150 pounds of human vs. killing 150 pounds of bees? That's a lot of bees.I hate to advocate genocide, but leaving such up to God, I think the planet would have been a lot better off had God eliminate Noah and family also. Humanity is rather a disease upon planet Earth.So, was God being moral in how "the flood" was executed?MooseModified by edit:Above I said "I think killing a human and killing a bee is equally immoral. Killing a human, however, is much more illegal."I would like to change that to:I think killing a human and killing a bee are both immoral. Considering the impact of such upon society, killing a human is much more immoral. That's why killing a human is also much more illegal.Edited by Minnemooseus, : Modified by edit.