Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,398 Year: 3,655/9,624 Month: 526/974 Week: 139/276 Day: 13/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence of the flood
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 586 of 899 (819821)
09-14-2017 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 582 by Percy
09-14-2017 5:34 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
KEEP IT UP. I DON'T HAVE TO RESPOND TO YOU.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 582 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:34 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 646 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 8:25 PM Faith has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 587 of 899 (819822)
09-14-2017 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 584 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:36 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
PROVE THAT THE SEDIMENTS STILL BEING DEPOSITED ARE CONTINUOUS WITH THE EXISTING GEO CVOLUMN.
Give us a time when the geological column stopped forming.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 584 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 589 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:38 PM edge has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 588 of 899 (819823)
09-14-2017 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 585 by edge
09-14-2017 5:36 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
AND I'VE ANSWERED YOU. WHAT YOU ATTRIBUTE TO ANY TIME PERIOD WITHIN THE GEO GOLUMN OCCURRED AFTER ALL THE STRATA WERE LAID DOWN.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 585 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:36 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 593 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:41 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 589 of 899 (819824)
09-14-2017 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 587 by edge
09-14-2017 5:37 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
AT THE END OF THE FLOOD.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 587 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:37 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 591 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:39 PM Faith has replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 590 of 899 (819825)
09-14-2017 5:39 PM
Reply to: Message 583 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:35 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
I'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THE CROSS SECTION AGAIN BUT THE SALT RISES, THE SEDIMENTS ABOVE IT SANK
THat wasn't my point.
Why are there salt deposits at all, if there was no basin? Where are your salt deposits that extend across the earth, continent to continent?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 583 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:35 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 592 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:40 PM edge has replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 591 of 899 (819826)
09-14-2017 5:39 PM
Reply to: Message 589 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:38 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
AT THE END OF THE FLOOD.
Not good enough. I need to know what age you will accept as the end of the flood.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 589 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:38 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 595 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:43 PM edge has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 592 of 899 (819827)
09-14-2017 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 590 by edge
09-14-2017 5:39 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
dON'T KNOW BUT THEY OCCUR IN SOME PLACES AS PART OF THE GEO COLUMN. YOU CAN GET A SENSE OF THE TIMING FROM HOW LONG IT TAKES SALT DOMES TO RISE.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 590 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:39 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 596 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:43 PM Faith has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 593 of 899 (819828)
09-14-2017 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 588 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:38 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
AND I'VE ANSWERED YOU. WHAT YOU ATTRIBUTE TO ANY TIME PERIOD WITHIN THE GEO GOLUMN OCCURRED AFTER ALL THE STRATA WERE LAID DOWN
This question doesn't make sense. Maybe you could quote my question.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 588 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:38 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 600 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:45 PM edge has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


(2)
Message 594 of 899 (819830)
09-14-2017 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 523 by Faith
09-14-2017 3:45 PM


Re: Again, the Geo Column shows the absurdity of the OE/ToE
Faith writes:
I've made the case many times.
The truth is that you've repeated your original arguments unchanged many times, and you've ignored the rebuttals many times. Whether you've made your case or not is for others to decide. Even creationists reject your arguments.
If you ever feel like recognizing that fact I may feel more like participating.
You're already not participating. You've ignored nearly 2/3 of the replies to you - how is that participating? You spend a great deal of your time complaining - how is that participating? Instead of discussing you simply declare your original positions over and over again - how is that participating? You rarely bother to gather evidence for your positions, you just make unsupported declarations - how is that participating?
It doesn't seem relevant whether you feel like participating - you're already not.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 523 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:45 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 597 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:43 PM Percy has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 595 of 899 (819831)
09-14-2017 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 591 by edge
09-14-2017 5:39 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
THE TIMING GEOLOGY IMPUTES TO WHATEVER LAYER WAS WASHED OFF THE CURRENT UPPERMOST LAYER OF THE GRAND STAIRCASE WOULD GIVE YOU THE "AGE" OF THE END OF THE FLOOD, WHICH WAS OF COURSE SOMEWHERE IN THAT YEAR OF ITS TRANSGRESSION AND RECESSION.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 591 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:39 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 598 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:44 PM Faith has replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 596 of 899 (819832)
09-14-2017 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 592 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:40 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
dON'T KNOW BUT THEY OCCUR IN SOME PLACES AS PART OF THE GEO COLUMN. YOU CAN GET A SENSE OF THE TIMING FROM HOW LONG IT TAKES SALT DOMES TO RISE.
You mean that they formed in pre-existing isolated basins?
And again salt domes are not the question. You are taking off on tangents.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 592 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:40 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 597 of 899 (819833)
09-14-2017 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 594 by Percy
09-14-2017 5:42 PM


Re: Again, the Geo Column shows the absurdity of the OE/ToE
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH

This message is a reply to:
 Message 594 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:42 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 599 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:45 PM Faith has replied
 Message 647 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 8:33 PM Faith has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 598 of 899 (819834)
09-14-2017 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 595 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:43 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
THE TIMING GEOLOGY IMPUTES TO WHATEVER LAYER WAS WASHED OFF THE CURRENT UPPERMOST LAYER OF THE GRAND STAIRCASE WOULD GIVE YOU THE "AGE" OF THE END OF THE FLOOD, WHICH WAS OF COURSE SOMEWHERE IN THAT YEAR OF ITS TRANSGRESSION AND RECESSION.
So you are saying that it was 'after the Palogene'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 595 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:43 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 601 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:47 PM edge has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 599 of 899 (819835)
09-14-2017 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 597 by Faith
09-14-2017 5:43 PM


Re: Again, the Geo Column shows the absurdity of the OE/ToE
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
More casual dismissal.
Another YEC privilege.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 597 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:43 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 602 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 5:47 PM edge has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 600 of 899 (819836)
09-14-2017 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 593 by edge
09-14-2017 5:41 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
I DON'T THINK IN TERMS OF "AGES," PERHAPS YOU NEED TO REPHRASE YOUR QUESTION

This message is a reply to:
 Message 593 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:41 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 603 by jar, posted 09-14-2017 5:47 PM Faith has replied
 Message 604 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 5:49 PM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024