He made it very clear he was not for Trump, and yet he argued forcibly against those anti-Trumpers who seem bent on bringing him down, saying he's our President and if we bring him down we are doing damage not just to Trump, not just to right-wingers but to the country.
The point of bringing down a bad President is to prevent him from doing greater damage.
This whole paradigm of two different news sources has me confused.
Does any news source doubt that the indictments are real? Does any news source doubt that guilty pleas are real or that prosecutions are real? There comes a point when opinions from different sources don't matter and reality sets in.
Right. Such as by fulfilling the promises he made to those who voted him into office so that the views of his defeated opponents can prevail although they were voted out.
When a candidate makes bad promises, I'd rather have him break them.