Christianity and the End Times

Too funny. And where is your evidence that I reject Christ or that my name is not recorded?Again, you are just trying to con the rubes and showing your ignorance jaywill.

quote:

---

It's YOU adding to the Bible, a classic Apologist conjob.

---

Point out the top two or three matters that I supposedly ADDED to the Bible ?I don't count a Bible student expounding on the Bible as necessarily ADDING to it.You are now going to back up you accusation and demonstrate what I ADDED to the Bible.Go.And you saying " Well, I don't think that is a good interpretation" is not necessarily anyone you disagree with ADDING to the Bible.Give us your TOP two or three examples of my Bible ADDITIONS in your next post.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

You added the utter nonsense in brackets, like substituting science (a concept foreign to any of the authors of the Bible stories) for knowledge.In fact the vast majority of the content of the Bible you market is stuff that is added to try to make the Bible fit the dogma of your cult.And again, this is still just another example of you trying to con the rubes, move the goal posts, change the subject and avoid dealing with the topic.

quote:

---

Too funny. And where is your evidence that I reject Christ or that my name is not recorded?

---

Please point out the amusing or the humorous part of this passage. Which part of that makes you giggle in amusement ?

quote:

---

Again, you are just trying to con the rubes and showing your ignorance jaywill.

---

So you are putting your trust in the book of Revelation being a lie ?You roll across the floor in hilarity because the words out of the last book of the Bible simply are not to be taken seriously ?Now those words seem much to agree with the words from the mouth of Jesus in Luke 10:20Both that verse in are A BIG JOKE to you then ? Ha, Ha ?? To have my name recorded by God in the heavens , big jolly joke!
Ha, Ha. To have my name written in the Lamb's book of life at the final judgment, well, that's hilarious.I'll take it seriously.
You go ahead and take it as amusing if you choose.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

The humorous part is you thinking you have a clue what might be in such a book if it existed and your continued attempts to just market the dogma of your cult rather than addressing the topic.I don't think Revelation is a lie, just that it is all simply failed prophecy that refers to events the author expected to occur almost 1900 years ago.

quote:

---

You added the utter nonsense in brackets, like substituting science (a concept foreign to any of the authors of the Bible stories) for knowledge.

---

Brackets signals that this is an editorial clarification.Now if you want to say SCIENCE is not a synonym of KNOWLEDGE say so.However. Thesaurus.com has as a synonym for SCIENCE - you guessed it - "body of knowledge" See Thesaurus.comAlso included as synonymous words/expressions to the noun SCIENCE as INFORMATION -

quote:

---

info
inside story
instruction
intelligence
KNOWLEDGE

---

[my bolding]Open mouth and change feet jar.If this is your strongest example of me ADDING to the Bible, editorial brackets, I don't have anything to worry about.What else you have ?

quote:

---

In fact the vast majority of the content of the Bible you market is stuff that is added to try to make the Bible fit the dogma of your cult.

---

EXAMPLES, SPECIFIC EXAMPLES PLEASE - OF ... ADDING to the TEXT of the Bible.Put up or shut up.

quote:

---

And again, this is still just another example of you trying to con the rubes, move the goal posts, change the subject and avoid dealing with the topic.

---

Dodge and excuse noted.
Weak example noted.Another lying accusation from jar, yea, noted. Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

quote:

---

The humorous part is you thinking you have a clue what might be in such a book if it existed and your continued attempts to just market the dogma of your cult rather than addressing the topic.

---

That passage is about the LAST JUDGMENT of all the dead human beings who come before God's great white throne.The fact that the last judgment of all the earth's deceased has not YET occurred is not a matter of "failed prophecy".I don't have to claim knowledge of everything that is written in said book of life. I only have to believe in the consequences of someone's name NOT being recorded in the book of life.Right?
Right. What is important is not that I know or claim to know everything written in the book of life. I am told about the result of something NOT written there, ie. a person's name.And at no time did I insist I KNEW that your name was not there. Put that strawman away.There is no hilarity associated with me thinking I KNOW everything written there. I never claimed that. And there is nothing amusing, as far as I can see, about being warned that it is best to have one's name recorded there.That is unless you prefer eternal departure into a lake of fire. That can't be good.

quote:

---

I don't think Revelation is a lie, just that it is all simply failed prophecy that refers to events the author expected to occur almost 1900 years ago.

---

Name me one failed prophecy from the book of Revelation then.Events that have not YET occurred as prophesied is not an example of the book's "failed prophecy".Point out - HERE'S the prophecy in Revelation.
Point out - HERE'S the failure for that prophecy to be fulfilled in history.Your next post please.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

Editorial is adding, imposing YOUR meaning on what is actually written.And it still is just another example of you trying to palm the pea, change the subject, con the rubes and move the goal posts. LOLOf course they are failed prophecy until such time as they do happen. Your denials are just more evidence that you have no touch with reality.Edited by jar, : Add rebuttal of the attempt to deny reality

So in this room you discuss bible topics with others, not by teaching and preaching, which is a one way communication form. Well you said it. And preaching is what you have openly admitted you are doing and what you intend to carry on doing. And I have said that if you want to do that, you open another thread called 'the meaning of man in the universe' - not in this thread or in the bible forums. That's how it works.Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

It's really not difficult. In this thread we are - or are supposed to be - discussing Christianity and the End Times. If you want to discuss something else, you create a new thread for it in the correct forum. That way the original thread doesn't get polluted and run off at all manner of tangents.

Are you being deliberately obtuse or does it come naturally?I didn't say a word about Jesus. I said YOU, jaywill, member of Evc forum. I said that YOU might be trying to con people or that YOU might be rube enough to believe the rubbish that you preach. Time has already told. Your misrepresentation of the Bible has been exposed repeatedly in this very thread. And instead of standing up for what you supposedly believe and addressing the criticism, you invariably run away. That does not seem like the behaviour of an honest man.

Or it could refer to jaywill, Faith and Phat.

A cold-fusion reactor that doesn't work "yet" is a failed cold-fusion reactor. It is a failure until it ceases to fail. You can't say it isn't a failure just because you really, really, really believe it will work "some day".

That's cute coming from the all-time champion of unsupported assertions. It's your job to show that it's not unique to Christianity by quoting some other source of the same promises.

An undated prophecy is just a wish.