NoNukes writes:
The problem is that suing requires that you have an injury or you don't have standing.
But it is the courts that decide standing and as more and more Judges are elected/appointed that are not evidence/reality based decision makers but rather fantasy/dogma based decision makers what constitutes "standing" may well change to the point many of us will find it unrecognizable.
We have seen this in the fairly recent past, during the attempts to find juries to try the Klan over lynchings and other violence and in the general spoils system of politics that was the norm at least up until the Garfield Presidency and that actually lead to his assassination.
Look at where the greatest support for shutting down media organizations and suing over false news came from in the poll.
NoNukes writes:
Finally, the buffoons who believe the lies are not going to sue. They desperately want the lies to keep coming.
But it is exactly those buffoons who will sue the reporter and news source that publishes that Trump did not win the Nobel Prize for Physics and that the Prize committee issued a strong denial that he had done so. It is that False News that will be the topic.
Remember, we are living in an age when Federal Budget Requests may NOT use the terms evidence based as justification for policy or funding.
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin