Summations Only

You are correct. It has nothing to do with atheism.That's because, as Agobot hinted on another thread, and I have seen consistently elsewhere, you are a member of a radical "religion" -- presumably evolutionism or Darwinism or some such!Humor aside, I find it telling that some creationists accuse scientists in general, and evolutionary scientists in particular, of alternately being atheists or of adhering to some fundamentalist "Darwinist" religion.Some go even further. From another website:

quote:

---

Let’s call [Darwinism] what it is, Satanism. That’s where it comes from - Satan- and he’s who they will spend eternity with for blaspheming against God.

​

I’m saying that evolution is not science and is of Satan.

---

I guess, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, eh?

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

And what about the Rigveda?How do your points #1 through #4 also apply to that document?

The Rigveda is not a religion, but rather a sacred text.The reason for my post was that your points #1 through #4 apply equally to that text as to the Bible. But because you are a true believer in the Bible (e.g., you called other religions "pagan"), you won't, indeed can't see the parallels. A true believer in the Rigveda might feel the same way.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.