Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,844 Year: 4,101/9,624 Month: 972/974 Week: 299/286 Day: 20/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Soft Tissue Surviving 65 Million Years?
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5951
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 47 of 77 (509752)
05-24-2009 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 40 by slevesque
05-24-2009 4:11 AM


I agree, but simply 'older then 50 000 years' as a result (assuming the max age is 50 000 years) would be sufficient to cast doubt on the interpretations creationist do of this data.
Absolutely wrong! Creationist have already used radio-carbon dating on coal in order to claim that it's only 50,000 years old. We already know that creationist lie because we have already heard them use it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by slevesque, posted 05-24-2009 4:11 AM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by slevesque, posted 05-30-2009 2:58 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024