Creation Evidence Museums...

IMO it has a whole lot to do with the topic. Whatever is right. Creationists are required to fund their own museums while millions of creationists are being required to fund public museums which depict unproven ideology contrary to the belief of a large percentage of the taxpayers.Is it that you don't want this truth aired, Ned?[This message has been edited by buzsaw, 04-09-2004]

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

I believe most libraries do allow both sides of most subjects to be represented whereas the museums don't.

If I remember correctly, it was way back when that I was restricted to the FFA for not being scientific in my argument as to why dating methods were flawed. I tend to hang out where I am more effective.

As they say, what's junk to one's gold to another. I suppose if you're ideologically secularist, things like human tools and cups imbeded in old coal would be considered junk. AdminSylas fixed the closing quotation tag to be [/qs]This message has been edited by AdminSylas, 05-05-2004 01:21 AM

I haven't seen where anybody's effectively shown the coal artifacts bogus. As for the footprints, there's been erosion, which distorts some, but I consider them to be valid.