Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What we must accept if we accept evolution
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 179 of 318 (281704)
01-26-2006 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by iano
01-21-2006 1:59 PM


Re: which ISM??
quote:
To presume the mind is physical without evidence that it is so is a philosphical decision to which we are all entitled. I just don't share this philosophy
You have this the wrong way round.
Why should we assume a non-physical mind when the brain has been so clearly demonstrated to have a very marked cause and effect influence on perception and behavior?
Ever heard of Phineas Gage?
Some months after the accident, probably in about the middle of 1849, Phineas felt strong enough to resume work. But because his personality had changed so much, the contractors who had employed him would not give him his place again. Before the accident he had been their most capable and efficient foreman, one with a well-balanced mind, and who was looked on as a shrewd smart business man. He was now fitful, irreverent, and grossly profane, showing little deference for his fellows. He was also impatient and obstinate, yet capricious and vacillating, unable to settle on any of the plans he devised for future action. His friends said he was “No longer Gage.”

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by iano, posted 01-21-2006 1:59 PM iano has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 182 of 318 (281709)
01-26-2006 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by robinrohan
01-22-2006 1:22 PM


Re: one more baby step.
quote:
Men don't have minds; they just have brains (thus saith evolution).
Where did you get this idea?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by robinrohan, posted 01-22-2006 1:22 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by robinrohan, posted 01-26-2006 9:33 AM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 183 of 318 (281712)
01-26-2006 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by joshua221
01-22-2006 9:07 PM


Re: Materialism = Evolution
quote:
According to evolutionists, and supporters of scientific research, there was no "before" to evolution.
I was just implying that evolution and materialism in human society go hand in hand.
What edge was referring to was not evolution itself, but the idea of evolution as proposed a couple hundred years ago.
His point was that people were materialistic (accumulation of wealth) long before people even had the barest inkling regarding what we now refer to as biological evolution.
Please be careful that you are not mixing up the definitions for "philosophical materialism" (all there is is nature) and being "materialistic" (placing a high value upon material goods)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by joshua221, posted 01-22-2006 9:07 PM joshua221 has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 191 of 318 (281764)
01-26-2006 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by robinrohan
01-26-2006 9:33 AM


Re: one more baby step.
The ToE in no way claims that the mind doesn't exist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by robinrohan, posted 01-26-2006 9:33 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by robinrohan, posted 01-26-2006 1:56 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 212 of 318 (281932)
01-27-2006 7:50 AM
Reply to: Message 192 by robinrohan
01-26-2006 1:56 PM


Re: one more baby step.
quote:
I'm saying the theory of evolution logically includes materialism. At one time in the history of earth, there were no "minds." Consciousness evolved. If minds are incorporeal, then one day in the history of evolution, corporeality produced incorporeality. That seems impossible.
Mind is produced by the brain.
Why is that "impossible"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by robinrohan, posted 01-26-2006 1:56 PM robinrohan has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 231 of 318 (282058)
01-27-2006 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by Faith
01-27-2006 7:22 PM


Re: Thoughts and deductions
quote:
Thinking is not synonymous with the activity of neurons no matter how consistently that activity can be found accompanying thinking.
Can you give a specific example of an instance where "thinking" has been observed to occur without neuronal activity?
That is, is there any rational reason to conclude that "thinking" is possible without neuronal activity?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Faith, posted 01-27-2006 7:22 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by Faith, posted 01-27-2006 9:37 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 233 of 318 (282068)
01-27-2006 10:03 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by Faith
01-27-2006 9:37 PM


Re: Thoughts and deductions
Can you show us what is involved with thinking other than neuronal activity?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by Faith, posted 01-27-2006 9:37 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by Faith, posted 01-27-2006 10:12 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 235 of 318 (282072)
01-27-2006 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 234 by Faith
01-27-2006 10:12 PM


Re: Thoughts and deductions
I have read the thread.
Perhaps you would like to apologize for being so snotty?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by Faith, posted 01-27-2006 10:12 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by Faith, posted 01-27-2006 10:41 PM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 246 of 318 (282291)
01-29-2006 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 245 by robinrohan
01-29-2006 11:54 AM


Re: Just a little theory
quote:
Egotism is a personal view about oneself.
...which can manifest as a feeling of superiority because of one's membership in a group. You mentioned several groups:
people who are intelligent, people who are physically attractive, people who have a lot of political power, people who have a lot of wealth, etc.
How is the feeling of superiority one has about oneself being one of God's chosen people not egotistical just because it stems from inclusion in a group?
"I feel so special and superior and chosen because I am a Born Again christian, so I'm going to go to Heaven no matter what and all of these other heathens who aren't born again are going to burn in Hell."
quote:
But I do find it very strange that my great-to-the-nth grandfather was a lizard, large or small. That's the part I find mind-boggling.
Yeah, it is pretty amazing, huh?
But how is this important?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by robinrohan, posted 01-29-2006 11:54 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 249 by robinrohan, posted 01-29-2006 12:17 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 248 of 318 (282296)
01-29-2006 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 247 by robinrohan
01-29-2006 12:12 PM


Re: general statement
quote:
I'm defining nature as everything physical. Anything that is not physical, if it existed, would be other than nature. Nature can't produce anything except physical things. So the incorporeal is supernatural--meaning "other than natural."
So, according to you, the number five is supernatural?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by robinrohan, posted 01-29-2006 12:12 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by robinrohan, posted 01-29-2006 12:19 PM nator has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 269 of 318 (282336)
01-29-2006 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 249 by robinrohan
01-29-2006 12:17 PM


Re: Just a little theory
"I feel so special and superior and chosen because I am a Born Again christian, so I'm going to go to Heaven no matter what and all of these other heathens who aren't born again are going to burn in Hell."
quote:
In my view, if I were a believer, that would be blasphemy.
That depends upon the interpretation of the Bible you choose to use, though, doesn't it?
Since there's no "correct" interpretation, the above statment is just as valid as your, or another Christian's view that it is blasphemous.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by robinrohan, posted 01-29-2006 12:17 PM robinrohan has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 270 of 318 (282337)
01-29-2006 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by Faith
01-29-2006 12:24 PM


Re: Just a little theory
quote:
A major tenet of the faith is that it is GIVEN to us for NO merit of our own.
That's one of many interpretations.
Since there's no such thing as a "correct" interpretation of the Bible, all interpretations are equally valid.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by Faith, posted 01-29-2006 12:24 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by Faith, posted 01-29-2006 4:03 PM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024