|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What we must accept if we accept evolution | |||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: You have this the wrong way round. Why should we assume a non-physical mind when the brain has been so clearly demonstrated to have a very marked cause and effect influence on perception and behavior? Ever heard of Phineas Gage?
Some months after the accident, probably in about the middle of 1849, Phineas felt strong enough to resume work. But because his personality had changed so much, the contractors who had employed him would not give him his place again. Before the accident he had been their most capable and efficient foreman, one with a well-balanced mind, and who was looked on as a shrewd smart business man. He was now fitful, irreverent, and grossly profane, showing little deference for his fellows. He was also impatient and obstinate, yet capricious and vacillating, unable to settle on any of the plans he devised for future action. His friends said he was “No longer Gage.”
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Where did you get this idea?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: What edge was referring to was not evolution itself, but the idea of evolution as proposed a couple hundred years ago. His point was that people were materialistic (accumulation of wealth) long before people even had the barest inkling regarding what we now refer to as biological evolution. Please be careful that you are not mixing up the definitions for "philosophical materialism" (all there is is nature) and being "materialistic" (placing a high value upon material goods)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
The ToE in no way claims that the mind doesn't exist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Mind is produced by the brain. Why is that "impossible"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Can you give a specific example of an instance where "thinking" has been observed to occur without neuronal activity? That is, is there any rational reason to conclude that "thinking" is possible without neuronal activity?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Can you show us what is involved with thinking other than neuronal activity?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
I have read the thread.
Perhaps you would like to apologize for being so snotty?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: ...which can manifest as a feeling of superiority because of one's membership in a group. You mentioned several groups: people who are intelligent, people who are physically attractive, people who have a lot of political power, people who have a lot of wealth, etc. How is the feeling of superiority one has about oneself being one of God's chosen people not egotistical just because it stems from inclusion in a group? "I feel so special and superior and chosen because I am a Born Again christian, so I'm going to go to Heaven no matter what and all of these other heathens who aren't born again are going to burn in Hell."
quote: Yeah, it is pretty amazing, huh? But how is this important?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: So, according to you, the number five is supernatural?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
"I feel so special and superior and chosen because I am a Born Again christian, so I'm going to go to Heaven no matter what and all of these other heathens who aren't born again are going to burn in Hell." quote: That depends upon the interpretation of the Bible you choose to use, though, doesn't it? Since there's no "correct" interpretation, the above statment is just as valid as your, or another Christian's view that it is blasphemous.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2197 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: That's one of many interpretations. Since there's no such thing as a "correct" interpretation of the Bible, all interpretations are equally valid.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024