Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,842 Year: 4,099/9,624 Month: 970/974 Week: 297/286 Day: 18/40 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The wonder of science vs. the banality of creation
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 18 of 64 (503835)
03-22-2009 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Sky-Writing
03-22-2009 6:19 PM


That's the basis for Science. There are no side rules that allow for matter or intelligence to spring forth on it's own. Or for good design to come out of nothing.
On whose authority do you make this pronouncement? Yours? Can you imagine, just maybe, that there are "rules of nature" that Sky doesn't know about? 'Cause I can imagine that there are some that no human yet knows about. And there's a couple of known ones that "allow for matter...to spring forth on its own." It happens all the time - electron/positron pairs out of nada.
You're talking bologna, Sky.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-22-2009 6:19 PM Sky-Writing has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-22-2009 7:41 PM Coragyps has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 24 of 64 (503851)
03-22-2009 8:38 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Sky-Writing
03-22-2009 7:41 PM


Something that shows (even hints) Newton was wrong.
Einstein did that about a century ago, as far as gravity and laws of motion go.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-22-2009 7:41 PM Sky-Writing has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 41 of 64 (503889)
03-23-2009 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by Straggler
03-23-2009 4:00 AM


Re: Law of Nature
But even ignoring that possibility it has to be said that basing ones notion of "why" on something that requires you to deny reality as discovered is just plain stupid.
Not to even start with the silliness of the notion that you only find out this great Why after you're dead!

"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Straggler, posted 03-23-2009 4:00 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024