Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,872 Year: 4,129/9,624 Month: 1,000/974 Week: 327/286 Day: 48/40 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where Did Big Bang Energy Come From?
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4403 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 19 of 84 (183330)
02-05-2005 7:25 PM


I'll give you the sum total....
of human knowledge on this question:
We don't know.

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by 1.61803, posted 02-05-2005 9:07 PM Eta_Carinae has replied
 Message 22 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 1:07 AM Eta_Carinae has replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4403 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 21 of 84 (183355)
02-05-2005 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by 1.61803
02-05-2005 9:07 PM


Hey, honesty is the best policy!
Why pontificate on the one question that I think I'll wager will never be answered.
I don't care if we get a working theory of quantum gravity and then a TOE I think this question shall still be unanswered.
Whatever we do, the initial singularity in all likelihood erases priors.
PS
Yes, I think I'll be back a little more. I've taken a year off work to think.
Mainly thinking about fundamental constant variations actually.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by 1.61803, posted 02-05-2005 9:07 PM 1.61803 has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4403 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 27 of 84 (183501)
02-06-2005 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by daaaaaBEAR
02-06-2005 1:07 AM


Re: I'll give you the sum total....
The Genesis account may be faulty from an evo's perspective but from mine I see the accuracy, even the scientific accuracy, of the Bible leaving no room for error in the first book.
Well, that just is a testament to your lack of scientific knowledge and is not an endorsement of the Bible.
You can only see the accuracy of Genesis because of your limitations. When you know more than you can see why it is so very wrong as a literal scientific document.
This message has been edited by Eta_Carinae, 02-06-2005 12:26 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 1:07 AM daaaaaBEAR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 3:04 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4403 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 29 of 84 (183543)
02-06-2005 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by daaaaaBEAR
02-06-2005 3:04 PM


Comment
If there's no way to know what happened before the Big Bang, then you can't affirm the Big Bang theory or plainly deny that there is a possibility (not a given) that there was a creator or some other supernatural force that intitiated the universe.
You will never see me say that the Big Bang denies a Creator.
What I can affirm, however, is that Universe was once in a hot dense state and we see the evidence for this. I can affirm the Big Bang. I also affirm this is neither pro or con a Creator.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 3:04 PM daaaaaBEAR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 3:39 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4403 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 31 of 84 (183548)
02-06-2005 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by daaaaaBEAR
02-06-2005 3:39 PM


Re: Comment
I can't affirm that, nor do I try.
What preceding theories????
This message has been edited by Admin_Eta, 02-06-2005 15:42 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 3:39 PM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024