Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where Did Big Bang Energy Come From?
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 17 of 84 (183211)
02-05-2005 2:46 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by daaaaaBEAR
02-05-2005 2:27 AM


Re: Where DID it come from?
I don't think that is known.
Simple as that, one of many big, important unanswered questions. So?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-05-2005 2:27 AM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 26 of 84 (183490)
02-06-2005 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by daaaaaBEAR
02-06-2005 1:07 AM


faith or assumption
If human knowledge can't explain how the Big Bang got its energy then either its faith or a weak assumption. If its faith then we're on the same level, just the wrong base.
It isn't faith: after all if I said I don't know if God spoke to the Pope you wouldn't call that faith would you?
It isn't an assumption: If I say that I don't know why your car won't start you wouldn't call that an assumption. I actually don't know and I'm not willing to make an assumption about the answer.
So it is neither faith or an assumption. It is an open question, the kind that scientists love and the religious seem to be unable to grasp the concept of.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by daaaaaBEAR, posted 02-06-2005 1:07 AM daaaaaBEAR has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 69 of 84 (214763)
06-06-2005 5:00 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Karhul
06-06-2005 4:17 PM


You need to understand first
Unfortunately, almost everything you think you know about the big bang is wrong. You can not begin to critize and idea that you are utterly ignorant of.
I sugest you read this thread and Big Bang - Big Dud.
You might want to then start asking questions rather than making pronouncements. There is then a small chance of you learning something.
I strongly suggest you read everything Sylas posts. If explains things as clearly as it possible. Also understand that this is not easy and can produce headaches.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Karhul, posted 06-06-2005 4:17 PM Karhul has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 75 of 84 (215481)
06-08-2005 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Philip
06-08-2005 6:55 PM


Cosmology and Redemption
As for NosyNed’s replies being right, however, I dare to differ. He always seems to be subtly evading the issue of redemption (I may be wrong). Ask him where he stands on theism and redemption. See if he’ll give praise to a redeemer in this or any thread.
As Sylas has pointed out cosomology has nothing to do with redemption (either for or against). Just like all others, my opinion on redemption has nothing to do with my views on science. Any given cosmolgist may be a Christian, a Muslim, a Jew, A Hindu or none of the above.
I have no personal interest in a redeemer so I tend to avoid commenting on it in the threads where it is appropriate and, of course, only make comments like the above to note where it is not appropriate to discuss.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Philip, posted 06-08-2005 6:55 PM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Philip, posted 06-09-2005 10:01 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024