EvC Forum: Questions Creationists Never Answer

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Questions Creationists Never Answer

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2323 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 118 of 141 (485463)
10-08-2008 4:31 PM

Reply to: Message 117 by olletrap
10-08-2008 4:27 PM

Re: easy

olletrap writes:

A "kind" iof animal, is whatever can breed with it. Canines can breed with canines, felines with felines etc... Felines can't breed with canines. Sothey are different "kinds" of animals.

Except that not all canines can breed with each other, so this definition needs work.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 117 by olletrap, posted 10-08-2008 4:27 PM		olletrap has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 120 by olletrap, posted 10-08-2008 8:38 PM		Huntard has not replied

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2323 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 123 of 141 (486655)
10-23-2008 12:46 PM

Reply to: Message 122 by wardog25
10-23-2008 12:09 PM

wardog25 writes:

I think your real problem is that you want a very specific answer for something that was not given as specific.

That is indeed the problem

What if I decided that I wasn't going to believe in Aristotle until I knew his shoe size and eye color?

What does this have to do with anything? The reason we want to know what kind means is so we can see if all kinds could've fit on the ark.

From all the posts on here, you can see there is definitely a broad definition for "kind". Can you ever reduce it down so much that we could classify every living thing according to that system? Of course not. Not enough information is given.

Which is the problem if you want to say the flood story is true.

So why is this so troubling? There are many things about history that we just can't know. If you can give me Julius Caesar's exact weight when he was 12 years old, I'll give you an exact definition of "kind".

What's troubling is the fact that people keep claiming the flood story is true, yet when asked for evidence can produce NONE.

Oh, and Caesar's weight when he was twelve was 35,67 Kg.

Edited by Huntard, : Changed the weight a bit, this one's correct though!

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 122 by wardog25, posted 10-23-2008 12:09 PM		wardog25 has not replied

Huntard

Member (Idle past 2323 days)

Posts: 2870

From: Limburg, The Netherlands

Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display

Message 132 of 141 (486726)
10-24-2008 1:53 AM

Reply to: Message 128 by terry107
10-23-2008 11:01 PM

Re: Dinosaurs and man

Hello terry107 and welcome to EvC

terry107 writes:

The ancient Bretons created mega monuments in various forms and the landscape of Brittany contains natural rock, menhirs, dolmens etc. Among the ancient forms whichagain are thought to have been created by the Pagan Celtics ---or even older civilizations.

among these forms are clear representations of dinosaurs--impossible according to Darwin but in line with the Bible and creation. So...?
Why continue to believe Darwin when everything that it predicts is wrong.

http://s8int.com/phile/dinolit83.html

First of all, those rocks to me look NOTHING like dinosaurs, so please try again.

Second, Evolutionary theory has been EXTREMELY accurate in its predictions, so, sorry, but you'll have to try again there too.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
	Message 128 by terry107, posted 10-23-2008 11:01 PM		terry107 has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

4 online now:	AZPaul3, PaulK, Rahvin, Taq
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 4/7