Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,867 Year: 4,124/9,624 Month: 995/974 Week: 322/286 Day: 43/40 Hour: 2/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did the expansion rate of the universe exceed lightspeed?
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 41 of 86 (458908)
03-02-2008 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Explorer
03-02-2008 3:06 PM


Tachyons
One of my original questions... what would happen if "something" went faster than light speed? We have concluded that no one would detect it , right? But would there be any other changes to "it"? What would happen to the relative time IF something went FTL?
Tachyons.
Physics is weird.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Explorer, posted 03-02-2008 3:06 PM Explorer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Explorer, posted 03-02-2008 5:52 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 51 of 86 (459218)
03-04-2008 7:45 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by LucyTheApe
03-04-2008 11:08 AM


Re: Speed of Light
My understanding is that mass is a property of energy. The faster an object goes, the more energy it has which corresponds to a loss of mass.
You don't mean loss, do you?
So massless particles such as photons travel at the speed of light. Anything traveling faster than the speed of light has a negative mass, which is, for me, a bit hard to grasp.
Actually, the facts are harder to grasp then that.
A particle travelling faster than light needs to have the square of its mass negative. This means that its mass is ... imaginary. (The imaginary numbers are the square roots of negative real numbers. If you've not come across them, you might want to look them up.)
Now, the way to cope with this is to adopt a positivist attitude. What does it mean, you ask, to have an imaginary mass? Well, it means that if you plug an imaginary number into the equations of physics where it says m, then they will describe how a faster-than-light particle behaves and what we'd observe if we looked at one. Hence, it is a perfectly meaningful concept: "What does it mean for a particle to have imaginary mass?" --- "It means that it'll behave like this, unlike particles with real mass, which behave like that."
After all, how do we ascertain that a particle has real non-zero mass? Because it behaves like the laws of physics predict that it would if it did. It's easier to turn the predictions back into your everyday experience only because you hang out with stuff with real mass.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by LucyTheApe, posted 03-04-2008 11:08 AM LucyTheApe has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024