Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 90 (8876 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 12-17-2018 3:31 AM
194 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Bill Holbert
Post Volume:
Total: 844,278 Year: 19,101/29,783 Month: 1,046/2,043 Week: 91/507 Day: 2/89 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
RewPrev1
...
5859606162
63
Author Topic:   Falsifying a young Universe. (re: Supernova 1987A)
creation
Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 931 of 944 (844369)
11-28-2018 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 927 by Coragyps
11-27-2018 8:40 PM


Re: Confusing
So you think and say. However why would we assume no time exists in the solar system?? Science doesn't even know what time is! For you to take a huge slice of space here, and claim it involves no time means that you are saying time does not exist here!

If you could ever get over that, you would still be checkmated since we still have space out there to deal with!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 927 by Coragyps, posted 11-27-2018 8:40 PM Coragyps has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 935 by Coragyps, posted 11-28-2018 10:11 PM creation has not yet responded

    
creation
Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 932 of 944 (844370)
11-28-2018 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 928 by ringo
11-28-2018 2:13 PM


Re: Confusing
No one can claim knowledge of that either way! My point exactly.

So we are left with belief.

Which belief best fits a recently created universe?! Ha.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 928 by ringo, posted 11-28-2018 2:13 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 936 by ringo, posted 11-29-2018 10:55 AM creation has responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 1908
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


(3)
Message 933 of 944 (844375)
11-28-2018 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 929 by creation
11-28-2018 6:44 PM


Re: Precision movement
creation writes:

There is nothing about the precision movements that tells you how creation works. Nor is there anything in those movements that tell us it was not created.

How is this an answer to Message 925?

Tanypteryx writes:

creation writes:

Well, look at a clock. There may be little cogs going round...moving. If one does not know what one is looking at, it may appear as random movement.


It may appear random to you, but to me it looks like a synchronized sequence of movements.

There is nothing about clocks that tells us about how stars or the Universe works.

creation writes:

You are in no position to call the bible fiction.

And you are in no position to say it is not, but once again this has nothing to do with Supernova 1987A.

creation writes:

Science cannot say yay or nay, either way.

Many conclusions of science are in direct disagreement with many stories and details of stories in the bible, but nothing in the bible has anything to do with how Supernova 1987A falsifies a young Universe.

creation writes:

It mentions a fair bit about stars also.

But not one word about the physics and chemistry of stars. And not a single mention that the sun is a star. You would think that might be an important fact. The bible does not mention Supernova 1987A.

creation writes:

What stars will do suddenly in the near future for example...go out!

More fiction that has nothing to do with using Supernova 1987A to falsify a young Universe.

creation writes:

It mentions a star that guided some men to a specific house!

More fiction that has nothing to do with using Supernova 1987A to falsify a young Universe.

creation writes:

It associates stars with the spiritual, which is more than poor science can do! Etc.

Well, thank goodness! Science has never had the function of associating anything with imaginary fictional fantasies and that has nothing to do with using Supernova 1987A to falsify a young Universe.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 929 by creation, posted 11-28-2018 6:44 PM creation has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 939 by creation, posted 12-01-2018 2:21 PM Tanypteryx has responded

    
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 1908
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.1


(1)
Message 934 of 944 (844376)
11-28-2018 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 930 by creation
11-28-2018 6:48 PM


Re: Confusing
creation writes:

We see the light from that SN here.

Yep.

creation writes:

Whatever working it does is here.

I have no idea what this means.

creation writes:

How much time was involved getting here cannot be known by science! Not unless you prove time exists and exists the same there also, as it is here.

Likewise distances are not known. Any use of trigonometry has to use at least one line that is in unknown time and space! Whether we use the rings out there and draw lines to them, or whether we use a slice of time and space here and draw lines to a star!

Repeating fantasies does not make them true.


What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


This message is a reply to:
 Message 930 by creation, posted 11-28-2018 6:48 PM creation has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 937 by creation, posted 12-01-2018 2:12 PM Tanypteryx has not yet responded

    
Coragyps
Member
Posts: 5365
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 935 of 944 (844377)
11-28-2018 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 931 by creation
11-28-2018 6:50 PM


Re: Confusing
Was post 931 intended to have any meaning, or to respond to anything I wrote?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 931 by creation, posted 11-28-2018 6:50 PM creation has not yet responded

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 15791
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.4


(2)
Message 936 of 944 (844412)
11-29-2018 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 932 by creation
11-28-2018 6:51 PM


Re: Confusing
creation writes:

No one can claim knowledge of that either way!


But YOU are claiming knowledge. You haven't been saying that there might possibly have been a "different nature". You've been saying that there definitely was. It's time for you to admit explicitly that every single word you've said about a "different nature" is pure fiction, made up, not founded in reality, nonsense, not worth the electrons you used to spew it.

creation writes:

Which belief best fits a recently created universe?!


Your made-up "different nature" doesn't fit reality and it doesn't fit the Bible. It's worthless.

And our geese will blot out the sun.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 932 by creation, posted 11-28-2018 6:51 PM creation has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 938 by creation, posted 12-01-2018 2:16 PM ringo has responded

  
creation
Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 937 of 944 (844532)
12-01-2018 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 934 by Tanypteryx
11-28-2018 9:34 PM


Re: Confusing
What it means is that we see light from the far universe only here on earth, or in the solar system area. Once something gets here, it then must start to obey our rules, our time, etc.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 934 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-28-2018 9:34 PM Tanypteryx has not yet responded

    
creation
Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 938 of 944 (844533)
12-01-2018 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 936 by ringo
11-29-2018 10:55 AM


Re: Confusing
To declare a different nature in the future to be false you would need some proof. Same with the far past.

If one is familiar with the bible and the millennium and end part of the tribulation period, and the pre/early post flood eras, they will see that our current nature cannot be in place at those times.

You have precisely zero hope of making a bible case against me.

As for science, you had every chance to try and support the belief in a same nature in the past. Yet we see nothing.

Why even talk?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 936 by ringo, posted 11-29-2018 10:55 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 940 by AdminPhat, posted 12-01-2018 2:51 PM creation has not yet responded
 Message 944 by ringo, posted 12-02-2018 1:43 PM creation has not yet responded

    
creation
Member
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 939 of 944 (844534)
12-01-2018 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 933 by Tanypteryx
11-28-2018 9:27 PM


Re: Precision movement
Actually, what the bible does say about stars makes the things you say impossible!

The biggest factor about stars may be the spiritual components/connections!

Yet you look at the distant unknown universe and interpret it all missing the forest for the trees!

Sure, there are also physical components out there, but one cannot use only them to model the universe!

Also, as far as time goes, seeing that a star (in light here that we see from the star) has some hydrogen in it does not tell us what space and time there are like!!!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 933 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-28-2018 9:27 PM Tanypteryx has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 943 by Tanypteryx, posted 12-01-2018 8:03 PM creation has not yet responded

    
AdminPhat
Administrator
Posts: 1897
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-03-2004
Member Rating: 2.0


(1)
Message 940 of 944 (844544)
12-01-2018 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 938 by creation
12-01-2018 2:16 PM


Re: Confusing
creation writes:

If one is familiar with the bible and the millennium and end part of the tribulation period, and the pre/early post-flood eras, they will see that our current nature cannot be in place at those times.

You have precisely zero hope of making a bible case against me.

As for science, you had every chance to try and support the belief in the same nature in the past. Yet we see nothing.

Why even talk?

Good point. I'll give you a 4 hour suspension to keep quiet.

Going forward...I want you to at least try and show some respect for your ideological opponents. You claim that nobody can make a Bible Case against you, yet you have not as yet even made a Bible Case (using scripture) to support your theories. I might add that I am a believer, but I do not take the Bible as word for word literal...it makes no sense to believe that way and be in any way intelligent.

Edited by AdminPhat, : No reason given.


  • Please stay on topic for a thread. Open a new thread for new topics.
  • Points should be supported with evidence and reasoned argumentation.
  • The sincerely held beliefs of other members deserve your respect. Please keep discussion civil. Argue the position, not the person.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 938 by creation, posted 12-01-2018 2:16 PM creation has not yet responded

    Replies to this message:
     Message 941 by Tangle, posted 12-01-2018 3:12 PM AdminPhat has responded

        
    Tangle
    Member
    Posts: 6397
    From: UK
    Joined: 10-07-2011
    Member Rating: 3.6


    Message 941 of 944 (844547)
    12-01-2018 3:12 PM
    Reply to: Message 940 by AdminPhat
    12-01-2018 2:51 PM


    Re: Confusing
    And in any case this is a bloody science forum...

    Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona

    "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android

    "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
    - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


    This message is a reply to:
     Message 940 by AdminPhat, posted 12-01-2018 2:51 PM AdminPhat has responded

    Replies to this message:
     Message 942 by AdminPhat, posted 12-01-2018 3:23 PM Tangle has not yet responded

      
    AdminPhat
    Administrator
    Posts: 1897
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-03-2004
    Member Rating: 2.0


    Message 942 of 944 (844550)
    12-01-2018 3:23 PM
    Reply to: Message 941 by Tangle
    12-01-2018 3:12 PM


    Keeping Science Forums Scientific
    Note however that the Bible Accuracy and Inerrancy thread is in the science forums. He could make his case there, but other than that he has no business cluttering these topics up.

    I'm going to ask that anyone who has a biblically based argument concerning time, nature, states of existence, or alternate universes unknown to mainstream science address your arguments in the bible Accuracy Science Forum. That's the only place you are allowed to speak going forward...unless you have evidence-based arguments that you can defend.


  • Please stay on topic for a thread. Open a new thread for new topics.
  • Points should be supported with evidence and reasoned argumentation.
  • The sincerely held beliefs of other members deserve your respect. Please keep discussion civil. Argue the position, not the person.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 941 by Tangle, posted 12-01-2018 3:12 PM Tangle has not yet responded

        
    Tanypteryx
    Member
    Posts: 1908
    From: Oregon, USA
    Joined: 08-27-2006
    Member Rating: 5.1


    (1)
    Message 943 of 944 (844556)
    12-01-2018 8:03 PM
    Reply to: Message 939 by creation
    12-01-2018 2:21 PM


    Re: Precision movement
    creation writes:

    Actually, what the bible does say about stars makes the things you say impossible!

    So what? It was written by bronze age goat herders who thought the stars were holes in the sky. You live in the 21st century, it's time to face facts, nothing in the bible has anything to say about the subject of this thread: Falsifying a young Universe. (re: Supernova 1987A)

    creation writes:

    The biggest factor about stars may be the spiritual components/connections!

    You just keep getting sillier and sillier.

    I notice that you have not in any way described any details about "The biggest factor about stars may be the spiritual components/connections."

    creation writes:

    Yet you look at the distant unknown universe and interpret it all missing the forest for the trees!

    You are the only one who doesn't realize that many things are known about the distant Universe. You would not understand it anyway.

    creation writes:

    Sure, there are also physical components out there, but one cannot use only them to model the universe!

    Well, you cannot. Meanwhile we will use everything that is known to model the Universe, including falsifying your universe using Supernova 1987A.

    creation writes:

    Also, as far as time goes, seeing that a star (in light here that we see from the star) has some hydrogen in it does not tell us what space and time there are like!!!

    Oh good. Luckily, the light from the star does tell us a lot of different things, but you will never know what they are because you will never read any astronomy articles or books.

    I'm just glad that you have no control over our acquisition of knowledge.

    Edited by Tanypteryx, : spelling


    What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python

    One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie

    If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy

    The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq


    This message is a reply to:
     Message 939 by creation, posted 12-01-2018 2:21 PM creation has not yet responded

        
    ringo
    Member
    Posts: 15791
    From: frozen wasteland
    Joined: 03-23-2005
    Member Rating: 2.4


    Message 944 of 944 (844590)
    12-02-2018 1:43 PM
    Reply to: Message 938 by creation
    12-01-2018 2:16 PM


    Re: Confusing
    creation writes:

    To declare a different nature in the future to be false you would need some proof.


    Wrong. To claim that something was different, YOU need some proof.

    You can't just say that France used to be in South America without some evidence. Nobody has to prove that it was always where it is now.

    You know that. You're just making up new "rules" that you know deep down are wrong.

    creation writes:

    As for science, you had every chance to try and support the belief in a same nature in the past. Yet we see nothing.

    Why even talk?


    YOU have had every chance to try and support YOUR belief in a different nature. Yet we see nothing.

    Why do YOU even talk?


    And our geese will blot out the sun.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 938 by creation, posted 12-01-2018 2:16 PM creation has not yet responded

      
    RewPrev1
    ...
    5859606162
    63
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.0 Beta
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2018