Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homeopathy
Sonne
Member (Idle past 5957 days)
Posts: 58
Joined: 05-20-2006


Message 2 of 142 (426614)
10-08-2007 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by molbiogirl
10-07-2007 6:12 PM


Hi Molbiogirl,
how do you suppose it "works"?
I don't think you'll find many who can claim to know how it "works", but you will find plenty who claim that it does work. This claim will of course be based on anecdotal "evidence", which seems to be treated the same as proper tested evidence by many people (good examples seen here in recent similar threads). A basic education in just what evidence is (and isn't) would go a long way to solve this issue.
I was administered homeopathy all through my childhood. There was never any question about it not working, but if it didn't seem effective, then that was due to the wrong dose amount, or wrong formula (apis 30 or ledum 30 for stings? Two drops or one?). Such is the way with alternative therapies: the therapy is never wrong, just the application. That's the escape route for practitioners.
Richard Dawkins' "The Enemies of Reason" is worth watching. This features an interview with homeopathist Dr Peter Fisher. Dawkins draws attention to the fact that alternative practitioners such as homeopaths spend a lot of time with their patients, more than regular doctors. And while this doesn't push the efficacy beyond placebo, it does give an insight into it's popularity.
Sonne

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by molbiogirl, posted 10-07-2007 6:12 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by molbiogirl, posted 10-08-2007 12:51 AM Sonne has not replied

  
Sonne
Member (Idle past 5957 days)
Posts: 58
Joined: 05-20-2006


Message 13 of 142 (426723)
10-08-2007 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Chiroptera
10-08-2007 10:15 AM


Confirmation bias would be when one only notices these positive coincidents and doesn't notice the failures of the treatment.
Ineffective or failed prescriptions are also often viewed as positive. For example a continuation of vomiting, after taking a remedy for its cure, might be due to the remedy fast tracking the ailment/expelling it from the body, etc. And if the remedy did coincide with the ailment subsiding, success! If the ailment becomes worse - that is not an uncommon response with homeopathy, in fact it is a sign of success.
From Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions
Side Effects
Homeopathic remedies rarely have side effects in the usual sense of the phrase because they are so dilute. On the other hand, a homeopathic remedy may sometimes appear to be making a patient's symptoms temporarily worse as part of the healing process. This temporary aggravation of the symptoms would be regarded by homeopaths as an indication that the remedy is effectively stimulating the patient's body to heal itself."
Sonne

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Chiroptera, posted 10-08-2007 10:15 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024