Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   why 'evolutionism' is a religion
derwood
Member (Idle past 1902 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 11 of 45 (2087)
01-14-2002 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by gene90
01-14-2002 11:24 AM


quote:
Originally posted by gene90:
Also you seem to have forgotten that if we did generate a new living thing through GE, it would be an act of "Creation" and your side would feel vindicated. Therefore, in this manner, Creationism is yet again shown to be non-falsifiable. Suggest to Creationists that if they want serious consideration, they should try playing fair.
Indeed. Creationist veterinarian Randy Wysong in fact pre-rejected any such feats in his 1976 book. Interestingly, he actually thoiught that life HAD been created in the lab - he merely claimed it to be evidence not of evolution, but of design, because the scientists added that magical ingredient "KNOW-HOW" (caps in original).
Absurd.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by gene90, posted 01-14-2002 11:24 AM gene90 has not replied

  
derwood
Member (Idle past 1902 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 39 of 45 (34471)
03-15-2003 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Jeptha
03-14-2003 9:15 PM


some folks just don't learn...
What if I could show evidence, agreeable to all interested parties, that the Second Law would NOT have prevented complex macroevolution?
see: http://EvC Forum: Jep and Entropy -->EvC Forum: Jep and Entropy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Jeptha, posted 03-14-2003 9:15 PM Jeptha has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024