You think that Bassilo and Irma carved all 11,000 stones themselves!?
never said they did.
apparently, lots of townsfolk were in on it. it was quite the booming industry for some time.
The stones were definitely discovered before 1992, so how DO you explain the dermal spines???
you mean on the sauropod? are you seriously contending that it looks like these guys?
image removed to fix the page width porblems
that's amargasaurus. they're from la amarga, ARGENTINA. that's a bit aways from peru, but granted not much. however, as clearly demonstrated, it looks nothing like one. aside from that, the dermal spines the study was on may have been "as high as 18cm!"
in other words, TINY compared to even the smallish 12m amargasausus.
what those look like are stegosaurus plates. no saurapod has ever been found with anything similar. amargusaurus is the closest we've got.
Thankyou! Only good point I see.
how about the fact that two-legged dinosaurs walked on two legs, not hopped on their tails like kangaroos?
This message has been edited by Arachnophilia, 06-12-2004 03:23 AM