You don't understand rational thought.
The "agree with me or you are irrational" card.
But let it be known that Rahvin, that is, a person who believes that apes morphed into men, thinks I am irrational. I am glad a person who says apes morphed into men thinks I am irrational. Logically it is the best evidence of my rationality.
You're the one who believes the widespread acceptance of evolution is the punishment for the widespread acceptance of evolution
Wrong.
Acceptance of evolution means that God is punishing said persons for denying Him credit as Creator. This explains why a theory with no evidence is accepted.
You're the one who accuses everyone who disagrees with you of being an "atheist"
Wrong.
I point out that evolution presupposes Materialism to be true and that Materialism presupposes Atheism to be true. In this context I point out that Christians who support evolution are not real Christians based on the evidence of their support of evolution based on Materialism.
You're the one that even most Creationists and IDists won't touch
Correction: it is Fundamentalists and Evolutionists that reject persons like myself, yes.
Ray originally writes:
But we know evolution is not science but a religion.
Rahvin in response writes:
It's not, as we've shown in many threads. Thanks for proving my point, Ray. You're yet another one of those who is desperate to say "you do it to!" so that your wacky beliefs can achieve the same validity as scientific theories. Your faith has not a lick of objective evidence - it's based entirely on appeals to tradition, appeals to authority, appeals to personal incredulity, and nothing of substance. You personally don't even have a loose contact with reality.
Evolution has always been a religion - the religion of Atheism. That is how it originally began. It remains the religion of Atheism despite the confused and ignorant Christians who support it.
We already know that evolutionists believe that their religion is science - very predictable. Evolution is scientISM, which is the deification of ideas that supplant God as Creator of reality and nature.
Before 1859 Creationists controlled the scientific establishment. Now Evolutionists control the establishment. Evolution was never science and will never be science - it is Materialism.
Creationism-ID is science. Our faith is based, in part, on the facts of science. Your faith in evolution is blind faith, supported by no facts or evidence. The "success" of your paradigm is explained by the punishment from God. How else does one explain the success of a theory that says God is not the cause of the observation of design seen in nature?
Since nearly all Atheists support evolution this fact alone is the only evidence that any objective person needs to know that evolution is false, unscientific and Atheist philosophy.
Your idol is a scumsucking moron of a televangelist who likes to bully gullible grandmothers until they send him money.
Dr. Scott was a highly respected Stanford Ph.D. He was the most respected scholar in the world during his lifetime. The degree of rage seen in your comment above is equal to the degree that you perceive Dr. Scott to be the scholar who refuted your theory.
Rahvin is just lashing out.
Darwin wasn't an atheist, and his personal theology has nothing to do with the objective, observable evidence that is the basis of his theory.
We know Darwin became an Atheist the moment that he concluded for transmutation. Because he lived in an anti-Atheism society he had to feign Deism-Theism, which accounts for your mistaken belief.
Ray
Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : grammar
Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : more grammar
™ Version 4.2
