Hi Stile,
Stile writes:
Any and all scientists (those who do not allow their world-view to corrupt their conclusions) all agree with the exact same answer -> Evolution. They all agree that creation science is not science. They all agree that creation science is not science because it allows its world view to corrupt its conclusions.
Upon what do you base this assertion?
I want to analyze this statement and you can correct me if I am misunderstanding you.
All scientist agree with the same exact answer -> Evolution.
If a scientist don't agree with this group they are not a scientist as they are letting their world view corrupt their conclusions.
Is this what you are saying?
Could it possibly be that they look at the same information and come to different conclusions?
Stile writes:
But that's just it. We are all on equal-footing to start with.
And, yes, creationists do experiments, testing and studying.
But that's where the similarities end.
Creationists then add in the additional information from their world view to skew their findings into a particular conclusion.
So you are saying these scientist who believe in creation do scientific experiments studying and testing. Just like the real scientist.
But since they don't reach the same conclusion their conclusion is tainted by their world view.
But on the other hand the scientist that does not believe in creation is immune to his/her world view affecting his/her conclusions.
Is that what you are saying?
God Bless,
"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."