Evidence for a Conspiracy of Scientists?

At least 98% of all this seems to have decayed into destructive babbling.The jokes have devolved. The arguments have degenerated. Its all becoming more entropic in nature.'Conspiracy' is such a metaphysical misnomer in this thread. 'Cruel hate' is our guilt here.{To all - See The EvC Way - Adminnemooseus}This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-28-2005 02:04 PM

(Thanks for your kind reply. Note, I don't have time for grammar checkers now)When I mentioned 'cruel hate' I was thinking not of you, but of undergraduate university (AL UAH and UAB) experiences I had in the late 80's. These were bio. professors and their pseudo-scientific texts.Absurd pseudo-scientific paradigms prevailed, (something) like: "Ontogeny recapitulates Ontogeny Phylogeny", "Fish-gill vestiges exist in human embyros", "Parallel evolution (marsupial reflecting mammal)", "Man has indeed evolved from stardust", (a biochemistry text), "Amniotic egg 'inventions'", "Micro- is equivalent to macro- evolution", etc.Meanwhile Physiology and Bio Professors voiced out disgust for Judaeo-Christian beliefs. One forcefully and coldly spoke of "mechanisms" to the point of being dis-heartening toward his students. The same hated pre-meds (myself) and persecuted those that sought his help if they expressed any Creationist thoughts whatsoever.Is this conspiracy? To me its merely 'cold/cruel hate'. Most seemed unconscious of their hate, let alone conspiracy, albeit they did 'gang up' (if you will) in their pretentiously scientific persecutions against Judaeo-Christian ID.