Sorry about the late reply, I just discovered the 'reply awaiting' page
The vast majority of scientific advances throughout history have been made under the belief that there is a God. Your point is moot.
My point would be moot if my point was that belief in God precludes making scientific discoveries. Instead, my point was that scientists fear poor science becoming accepted. degrading the standards of science.
What they REALLY fear is that if there is ANY validity to the belief in a creator, they will have to change their sinful lifestyle, recognize an authority, and abandon their god-less worldview.
This is the real reason they oppose ID.
I contend that many scientists already believe in a creator and so cannot possibly fear this.
In addition: Speak with scientists, many of them will say something along the lines of "It is possible that God exists, it is just impossible for science to demonstrate that, as such any science which purports to demonstrate God is almost certainly flawed."
This message has been edited by Modulous, 05-10-2005 08:41 AM