Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   dinosaur and human co-existence
DC85
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 21 of 271 (559261)
05-07-2010 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Buzsaw
05-07-2010 10:52 PM


Re: Dino Serpents
Their body physiology, in fact did become profoundly different after the fall curse, in which they lost their long legs, became belly crawlers, much smaller and perhaps other changes adapting them to a totally different existence.
Wow... Thank you buzzsaw for showing us how little you know about biology. Dinosaurs even without legs would still be profoundly different from snakes. I can find far more in common with a Chicken then I could with a snake.
If you could take an alligator balloon; one of those that you can reshape and stretch out and enlarge the hind legs, and blow up the torsal, you wouldn't have to do a whole lot to the head and rest of the body to make it appear like Euparkeria
Thank you Buzz Euparkeria is a great example of a family that were the transitions between Dinosaurs and Reptiles and in fact is not a Dinosaur. You'll find Euparkeria and late cretaceous Dinosaurs have very little in common...
Edited by DC85, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Buzsaw, posted 05-07-2010 10:52 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
DC85
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 25 of 271 (559267)
05-07-2010 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Buzsaw
05-07-2010 11:22 PM


Re: Dino Serpents
Reality is that both dinos and reptiles are known as serpents
This news to me.... sounds like something you made up....
, many having similar visible physiological appearances, so which is more compatible with reality
I must see this. I'm sure you have examples if you made such a claim. Please provide it

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Buzsaw, posted 05-07-2010 11:22 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
DC85
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 129 of 271 (559811)
05-11-2010 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Buzsaw
05-11-2010 4:52 PM


your knowledge is inadequate
To my knowledge none of these was as abrupt or extensive an event as the K-T event.
Like normal your knowledge is inadequate
The Permian Extinction 250 million years ago was far "worse" then the KT event.
96 percent marine and 70 percent of land dwelling life went extinct during the Permian event. Was this an earlier fall?
Why did 53% of families living at the time suddenly disappear? These families have none living today.
It appears you're wrong Buz.... Care to explain?
Edited by DC85, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Buzsaw, posted 05-11-2010 4:52 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Buzsaw, posted 05-11-2010 10:19 PM DC85 has replied

  
DC85
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 148 of 271 (560021)
05-12-2010 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Buzsaw
05-11-2010 10:19 PM


Re: Topic Drift
I'm just trying to understand the timeline in your mind and I think that is within the topic. I need to understand where you are.
Are you saying all the species that we say went extinct 250 Million years ago during the Permian event(before Dinosaurs) co-existed with the species we say went extinct 65 million years ago during the KT event around 4350? Do you have evidence for this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Buzsaw, posted 05-11-2010 10:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
DC85
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 152 of 271 (560034)
05-12-2010 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Dr Adequate
05-12-2010 6:16 PM


Re: Reptiles and Dinosaurs
This one is closer in relation to mammals then most reptiles just point out further...
Edited by DC85, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-12-2010 6:16 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-12-2010 7:19 PM DC85 has replied
 Message 157 by Buzsaw, posted 05-13-2010 11:00 PM DC85 has not replied

  
DC85
Member (Idle past 370 days)
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 154 of 271 (560037)
05-12-2010 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Dr Adequate
05-12-2010 7:19 PM


Re: Reptiles and Dinosaurs
may be more closely related to mammals than to modern reptiles, but it's still a reptile.
Reptile is a horrible division. I disagree Dinosaurs and early Synapsids should grouped with reptiles. Now we're taking things off topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-12-2010 7:19 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024