Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   20 years of the Creation/ID science curriculum
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3452 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 50 of 305 (453439)
02-02-2008 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by randman
01-31-2008 6:22 PM


Re: one thing is clear
The non-evos appear to be the more open-minded and less inclined towards indoctrination as they (we) are arguing for more openness in the class-room and both or perhaps more than "both" sides be taught in schools.
Really? Why is it that fishboy in Message 1 is looking online for references for his Christian biology class? Does he not know where to go to look for scientific papers?
We've all read through the ID and creationist "papers" and we know where to find them. My little sister's 7th grade bio teacher in the middle of BFE Florida knows about the AiG sites and she regularly reads relevant literature in the biological sciences.
Meanwhile, are Christian school teachers actually looking at the "other side?" Do they actually teach the ToE as it is or as Hovind explains it?
Do Christian school teachers have time to go over every piece of evidence and provide the "alternate interpretation?" Would they?
No.
Are creationist parents being given an accurate overview of evolution in order to teach their kids or even educate themselves?
Or is the "teach the controversy" really one-sided?
It's funny (but not really) how there is plenty of literature out there for anyone to learn about evolution (or geology,physics,chemistry,etc), but the only problem is that you actually have to know something about it and you have to specialize in order to know about it in detail. However, in order to know (as a teacher, student, interested observer) about creation all you have to do is read a few websites and/or trust your pastor/guest speaker/someone trying to sell videos/books.
You can get all you need to know off of YouTube! Or a video off of TBN for $14.95!!
And then you can let 15 year olds decide what is true! What a great idea! No experience necessary!
That is why creationists/IDists want to get into the secondary school levels. Because kids with only a basic understanding can decide what is science better than those with a degree either way?
Please note that I said "either way."
Letting children decide science is a bad idea no matter what.
That is why we have an open internet system and expansive bookstores in this country. It's not like the kids are forced to accept anything (especially if their parents/friends/pastors disagree). Unless the schools or bookstores or internet access are censored or marginalized (any sense of scientific censorship? Any websites that are off limits? Didn't think so.)
Knowledge is a great thing no matter what prompts it. And it is all out there.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by randman, posted 01-31-2008 6:22 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Beretta, posted 02-02-2008 11:44 AM Jaderis has not replied

Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3452 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 51 of 305 (453452)
02-02-2008 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Buzsaw
01-31-2008 2:11 PM


Re: Sometime Within 20 Years
Buzsaw writes:
8. Funding might be more evenhanded to include some aspects of nonconventional research, archeology and studies.
Tanypteryx writes:
The various ID/Creationist organizations already have $millions that they are spending on lawyers and campaigns to get their doctrine into science classes. It would be better spent on research. Do you mean they would like to fund conventional, real scientific research?
I find it funny that Buz omitted this portion in his response. He asked about funding and was given a reason why money wasn't spent on pet creationist projects. Perhaps he might rather not think about all of the millions of dollars that are being wasted on PR and lawyer's fees (you might want to ask your pals at the DI or those lobbying the gov't) instead of funding his precious archaeological digs or actual scientific research.
Nice dodge, Buz.
You answered (kinda) all of the rebuttals except for this one...why is that?

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Buzsaw, posted 01-31-2008 2:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024