Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,475 Year: 3,732/9,624 Month: 603/974 Week: 216/276 Day: 56/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Feedback about reliability of dating
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 2 of 77 (48367)
08-02-2003 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jake22
08-02-2003 12:01 AM


a) Basaltic rocks are very low in Potassium, and are thus poor candidates to get a quality radiometric date via K/Ar methods. I would have to see the original article to see why it was evern tried.
My knowledge it pretty thin on such things, but from what I know, basalts are poor rocks to date by any radiometric method. Perhaps others can chip in if and how basalts can be directly radiometricly dated.
b & c) The examples have VERY RECENTLY (earlier today!) been specificly covered at the "Carbon-14: A Scientifically Proven Dating Method?" topic.
Moose
[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 08-01-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jake22, posted 08-02-2003 12:01 AM Jake22 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024