Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Uranium Dating
Contingent
Junior Member (Idle past 5608 days)
Posts: 2
Joined: 11-19-2008


Message 1 of 153 (488890)
11-19-2008 3:36 AM


"The process of radiological dating has several intrensic flaws, the most glaring of which is that it assumes set levels of the isotopes measured between samples origionally. For example, in U238 dating, the U238 decays into lead. The only problem with dating samples based on the ratio of the two is that lead occurs natrually, and often in the company of uranium and other heavy metals. The ratio of natural lead to uranium is not constant ether, as lead can occur with little or no radiological involvement.
Basically, there is no way of predicting the actual decay time on the remaining U238, as extra natural lead is everywhere and probably with the uranium wherever it may manifest. This same inaccuracy is inherant in all other methods of radiological dating. Nothing says that the levels of carbon 14 are or were constant at any point in history, or that the levels of solar radiation that cause the isotope in the atmosphere were ever constant."

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by AdminNosy, posted 11-19-2008 9:10 AM Contingent has not replied
 Message 4 by Chiroptera, posted 11-19-2008 9:11 AM Contingent has not replied
 Message 5 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 11-19-2008 9:33 AM Contingent has not replied
 Message 8 by Coyote, posted 11-19-2008 10:52 AM Contingent has not replied
 Message 87 by shalamabobbi, posted 08-13-2010 12:25 PM Contingent has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024